<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Disposable Coalition of the Necessary</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4678</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4678</guid>
					<description>Hello, I must be going.

Cognitive dissonance is holding two mutually exclusive ideas at the same time, however it does require the ability to actually think. 

No sense of irony, and no need to make sense. As Tom Maliotsie (sp?) would say, "Unencumbered by the humans thought process".

Good-by, glad I've just arrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I must be going.</p>
<p>Cognitive dissonance is holding two mutually exclusive ideas at the same time, however it does require the ability to actually think. </p>
<p>No sense of irony, and no need to make sense. As Tom Maliotsie (sp?) would say, &#8220;Unencumbered by the humans thought process&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good-by, glad I&#8217;ve just arrived.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lovable liberal</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4679</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4679</guid>
					<description>But of course Lou Dobbs is repeating as gospel the new White House revision of the value of the coalition of the billing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course Lou Dobbs is repeating as gospel the new White House revision of the value of the coalition of the billing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: historyenne</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4680</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4680</guid>
					<description>What this illustrates is the complete incompatability between the lip service the administration pays to concepts like multilateralism and what they really think of our "allies."  As for Dubya himself, even his ignorance is encyclopedic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this illustrates is the complete incompatability between the lip service the administration pays to concepts like multilateralism and what they really think of our &#8220;allies.&#8221;  As for Dubya himself, even his ignorance is encyclopedic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: G-Man</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4681</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4681</guid>
					<description>Webster defines a "coalition" as: "a temporary alliance of distinct parties, persons, or states for joint action". Temporary simply doesn't mean "5-10 years" to most people like Bush's wishes it did.  Then again, "cake walk" usually implies far fewer casualties...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webster defines a &#8220;coalition&#8221; as: &#8220;a temporary alliance of distinct parties, persons, or states for joint action&#8221;. Temporary simply doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;5-10 years&#8221; to most people like Bush&#8217;s wishes it did.  Then again, &#8220;cake walk&#8221; usually implies far fewer casualties&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken...  Just Ken</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4682</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4682</guid>
					<description>Again Adam, 

I honestly can't tell if  if you're making Jokes or you're just reporting the news.

Some of what's been coming out of this administration sounds a lot less believable than what a hundred humorists could stamp out on a hundred keyboards.

I miss Jimmy Carter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again Adam, </p>
<p>I honestly can&#8217;t tell if  if you&#8217;re making Jokes or you&#8217;re just reporting the news.</p>
<p>Some of what&#8217;s been coming out of this administration sounds a lot less believable than what a hundred humorists could stamp out on a hundred keyboards.</p>
<p>I miss Jimmy Carter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4683</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4683</guid>
					<description>As well as the administration's confused/opportunistic concept of multilateralism, this post also highlights their EXTREMELY ANNOYING habit of spinning every bit of criticism as demeaning, unpatriotic, unsupportive, Vietnam vet spittin' sludge.

How stupid are people to not realize that the statements Bush &#038; Co. make just don't make sense??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As well as the administration&#8217;s confused/opportunistic concept of multilateralism, this post also highlights their EXTREMELY ANNOYING habit of spinning every bit of criticism as demeaning, unpatriotic, unsupportive, Vietnam vet spittin&#8217; sludge.</p>
<p>How stupid are people to not realize that the statements Bush &#038; Co. make just don&#8217;t make sense??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4684</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4684</guid>
					<description>Why expect Bush to make sense?  He's operating on faith, not reason.  His early mention of a crusade wasn't a gaffe; it remains the clearest explanation of his foreign policy to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why expect Bush to make sense?  He&#8217;s operating on faith, not reason.  His early mention of a crusade wasn&#8217;t a gaffe; it remains the clearest explanation of his foreign policy to date.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brad</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4685</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4685</guid>
					<description>Disposable, perhaps. But are they fungible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disposable, perhaps. But are they fungible?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tess</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4686</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/04/20/the-disposable-coalition-of-the-necessary/#comment-4686</guid>
					<description>why is it that you still have a job?  scott mcclellan can clearly write in his own jokes (mostly unintentional), and i can't even tell if this is a spoof or a real press conference anymore.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it that you still have a job?  scott mcclellan can clearly write in his own jokes (mostly unintentional), and i can&#8217;t even tell if this is a spoof or a real press conference anymore.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
