From The Baltimore Sun
Bush, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and L. Paul Bremer III, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, labeled the adversaries variously as “terrorists,” remnants of Saddam Hussein’s regime and outlaws, and continued to deny that the deadly fighting this week reflected growing opposition to the United States and its plans for Iraq.
____________________________________
FALLUJAH - Heavy fighting was reported overnight as marines engaged in block-to-block fighting with the last remaining group of Saddam loyalists in what was described as a “cleanup operation.” These holdouts are expected to capitulate “any minute now.”
BAGHDAD - Several US armored divisions found themselves in heavy fighting and temporarily pinned in place. Although no casualty reports are available as yet, the attacks were attributed to a disgruntled Iraqi postal worker.
NAJAF - Spill-over from a “domestic dispute” was blamed for the barrage of RPG’s and gunfire that struck an Abrams tank and caused several injuries.
KIRKUK - A 45 minute firefight through the heart of the city caused heavy casualties among both Americans and Iraqis. A CENTCOM spokesman said the opposition was apparently comprised of “a guy named Ahmed and his friend Doug,” two “local cranks” who “just won’t get with the program and are ruining it for everybody else.”





19 comments
Don
April 7, 2004 at 2:46 pm
1It’s been said before, but
“One man’s ‘Terrorist’ is another man’s ‘Minuteman/Patriot’”
if we look back into our own history …
Heron
April 7, 2004 at 3:04 pm
2I thought that all that is wrong in Iraq must be Bill Clinton’s fault. Everything else is according to Bushco.
tim
April 7, 2004 at 3:10 pm
3What’s the Arabic for “Tet”?
Aaron Headly
April 7, 2004 at 3:28 pm
4“Mommy, mommy - can I invade a country run by a brutal dictator and depose him? I promise to take care of it.”
“Now, Georgie, do you remember what happened last time? Of course you can’t. Go play with your toys.”
Mojo
April 7, 2004 at 4:18 pm
5I just saw Secretary Rumsfeld and General Meyer live on CSPAN talking about how Sadr’s forces represented a “miniscule” portion of the population. (They cleverly avoided answering the question about the estimated size of the resistance overall.) They said he had fewer than 6000 fighters out of a total Iraqi population of 25 million. I did a little math based on 5000 fighters and it was quite a coincidence that an AF General was talking about how that was a miniscule portion when it is is virtually identical to the proportion between the US population and the US Air Force (including Guard but not Reserve). I guess a “miniscule” forces can have some impact.
Bob
April 7, 2004 at 8:09 pm
6According to one senior White House official, much of the recent gunfire and rocket launching was to celebrate the opening of Fallujah’s newest TGI Friday’s.
Murray
April 7, 2004 at 8:28 pm
7Adam, to Bush, EVERYONE not in lockstep with his administration is a terrorist. As a part time substitute teacher, even I am one, (let alone all of the writing I’ve done on this site) according to Bush’s Education Secretary.
We are all evildoers.
Johnboy
April 7, 2004 at 9:48 pm
8Not anything about this war seemed funny to me today until your posting. It’s nice to laugh a little instead of just fighting back tears for the dead.
A Viet Nam vet
Mojo
April 7, 2004 at 11:40 pm
9Anybody with actual math skills will probably have noticed by now that I made a teeny, tiny error in my last post (missed by a factor of ten!). It’s this darn calculator I picked up second hand from the folks who originally figured out how much Bush’s Medicare proposal would cost. Sorry. Of course what I’m really apologizing for is my admission of error, since that’s really out of style right now.
Dee
April 8, 2004 at 10:35 am
10It’s just those Iraqis are big UConn fans, and a double championship is cause enough to head to the streets and fire off a few rounds.
BettieWheelie
April 8, 2004 at 11:19 am
11“If you don’t like it, you can leave.” That’s a common sentiment uttered to dissenters and especially those who write letters to the editor here in Zion.
Mary
April 8, 2004 at 12:15 pm
12Does that”…you can just leave!” apply to our troops?
Peter
April 8, 2004 at 4:44 pm
13There’s only one way out now. Take Saddam out of jail, put him in the middle of one of the palaces and back away slowly saying, “Sorry. Can’t imagine what we were thinking. No hard feelings. We apoligize for the rubble.”
meantim
April 8, 2004 at 5:28 pm
14What are the odds John boy is senator Kerry?
JOhnnyko
April 8, 2004 at 8:00 pm
15Vegas has them at 9 to 1 against, but I can give you 14 to 1 if we deal in cash upfront.
Chris Knutsen
April 8, 2004 at 11:20 pm
16I wish I could get a chuckle out of this. nothing seems funny about the turn of events in Iraq. sorry if I sound like a crank, but I see no place for humor here.
Mary
April 9, 2004 at 10:29 am
17Chris-
We understand. Not everyone can take gallows humor. I just see this is proving the old adadge about death and taxes.
Fitting for April, n’est-il pas ?
Beth
April 9, 2004 at 7:53 pm
18Chris,
Adam wasn’t mocking the situation in Iraq. He was parodying the administration whose lies and willful blindness brought us to this point and who, faced with the fiercest fighting since the invasion — maybe the fiercest including the invasion — try to pass the resistance off as “remnants” or “outlaws”.
Chris Knutsen
April 10, 2004 at 10:04 pm
19For the record, Beth, of course I wasn’t accusing Adam of mocking Iraqis. I understand that it was satire, and that his target was the administration (duh). It’s just that some situations beg for satire, others are so bleak and distressing that levity, however well intentioned, feels weirdly off the mark. My conviction presupposes that there are times to be serious, times when the tonic of laughter seems not just out of place, but a bit ugly. I grant not everyone feels this way — the class clown, the moral relativist, those who abjure earnestness at all costs. Let me be clear: generally, I love dark humor. I’m the first one to strike up the band for the dance macabre. Wit is often our only formidable ally against hypocrisy. But when you’ve witnessed the shocking brutality of war, and all the degradations that go with it, as anyone with eyes and sense has, taking the piss out of the administration with little absurdist digs just seems too facile, too breezy. Why not say it with a straight face? Would that be too boring? Not entertaining enough for the rest of the chat group? Tone is as important as content, and not just because it helps us hear each other. We should keep covenant with the morality of our words, and respect the value of whatever dark truths we’re trying to illuminate, because if we can’t ennoble ourselves through language, then how else are we gonna do it?
One last thing, Mary, about gallows humor, and then I’ll step down from the soapbox. Usually, it’s uttered by the folks staring at the gallows. I would never, needless to say, begrudge an Iraqi a sense of dark comedy about the American occupation (or an American soldier his sense of the laughable waywardness of our administration) — although I can’t imagine anyone in the region, Iraqi or American, has the psychic luxury to laugh right now. Jokes just feel different coming, as they are here in a homeland blog, at such an incredible remove from the action. We should all think hard about what it’s like to live under the fog of war before we write little skits about it.