From CNN - On Monday, African-American activist Randall Robinson said Aristide had called him on a smuggled cell phone and told him that he did not leave office voluntarily. Robinson said Aristide told him he was “abducted” by U.S. soldiers in “full battle gear” early Sunday and was being held “incommunicado” in the Central African Republic.
Robinson, speaking from the Caribbean island of St Kitts, said Aristide had telephoned him on a cell phone on Monday morning from a room in the Central African Republic, where he said he was being guarded by African and French soldiers.
“The president said to me that he had been abducted from his home by about 20 American soldiers in full battle gear with automatic weapons and put on a plane” on Sunday morning, Robertson said.
“Across the aisle from him and Mrs. Aristide sat the American soldier who apparently was the commander of the contingent. They were not told where they were going, nor were they allowed to make any phone calls before they left the house or on the plane,” he said.
He said Aristide had told him the plane made two stops before landing in the Central African Republic and that the Americans had instructed them not to raise the blinds to look out when the plane was on the ground.
“Not until they arrived did the president learn where he was,” Robertson said. “He said to me twice before he had to get off the phone, ‘Tell the world that it’s a coup. That American soldiers abducted (me).”‘
The kidnapping accusation also was reported Monday by Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California, and Aristide’s attorney, Ira Kurzman. Waters said she had spoken with Aristide by phone…
White House spokesman Scott McClellan described the claims as “complete nonsense.” “Conspiracy theories do nothing to help the Haitian people move forward to a better, more free and more prosperous future.”
________________________________
Being a respectable commentator with impeccably high standards, I generally don’t trade in rumors unless I have the opportunity to start them (and thus secure myself a place in journalistic history if they turn out to be true). But the possible kidnapping of Aristide by US marines is just too rich and weird to pass up. There’s a lesson here: If you want us big media types to pick up your implausible rumor, you’ve gotta swing for the fences.
So, the big question is this: What the @#&$! went on there?
[By the way, my thanks to William Safire, who in last Sunday’s “On Language” column explained that @#&$! is derived from the latin root “$#*” and seems to be a colloquial merging of that and the old Flemish “@^%~.” I’d always thought it was a bastardization of the Portuguese “%@$!”]
Anyway, there seem to be a limited number of possibilities here, and they all have the virtue of being utterly ridiculous:
1) Aristide is lying. He’s so embarrassed by what’s happened and so determined to to muster popular support for his eventual return that he actually asked our marines to escort him to safety and then, while still in their custody, turned around and accused them of kidnapping. It’s not the kind of thing that you or I would feel comfortable doing while still surrounded by a battalion of heavily-armed leathernecks, but Aristide might be made of sterner stuff. And I use “stern” in its Old English sense, meaning “the quality of being out of one’s &$*#$ gourd.” [Thanks again to Mr. Safire!]
2) Aristide is telling the truth. It’s uncomfortable to say so, but this one’s pretty plausible. The Bush administration has demonstrated again and again that it’s willing to break a few eggs in the interests of making a more palatable international omelette. The eggs in question are multilateralism, protocol, international law, transparency, and honesty, but it’d be hard to argue that they’re not capable of justifying some extremely loony means in pursuit of some desirable ends. Besides, there’s always the tried and true Bush excuse that it was done by a Well Meaning But Ultimately Misguided Underling Who Helped Us Achieve Our Ends But Whose Actions We Don’t Condone At All No Sir Not In The Least. The administration seems to be riddled with these handy rascals, who have been responsible for everything from riots at Florida voting centers to the Plame leak to file stealing to the insertion of nonexistent African yellowcake in the State of the Union address. Every morning, it seems, the White House wakes up to see that they’ve been supplied with dozens of pairs of shoes by benevolent elves, saving their modest cobbler’s existence. And if a lot of other folks wake up to find their shoes mysteriously missing, well, we can’t blame that on the administration…
3) It was all a big misunderstanding. It’s possible. Think of it: The last time a phalanx of armed marines came marching into your house and politely offered their services in the event that you should want to hop onto a plane and live out your life in African exile, did you jump to the conclusion that this was more of an order than a request? You probably did.
Ultimately, Aristide’s exit is a good thing, preventing a lot of bloodshed and suffering, at least in the short term. And if memory serves, it wouldn’t be the first time in the past year that the US has effected a desirable regime change with Charles Bronson-esque disregard for international law and protocol. And the Haiti thing bears one more telling resemblance to the Bush administration’s other foreign escapades:
We don’t have any coherent idea of what to do next.





19 comments
tess
March 1, 2004 at 3:39 pm
1oh boy! what next? are we going to assasinate kim il jong, or worse yet make him dance in the next nutcracker ballet? elves! elves! elves!
Ras_Nesta
March 1, 2004 at 4:17 pm
2The problem is, Haiti has a constitution that like ours, dictates that the President serves a set term. In their case, 5 years.
So Aristide’s exit is not a good thing, but a coup against Haiti’s constitution.
Not even these ends justify the means. But we we know how Bush respects constitutions don’t we? What with the “Defense of Bigotry Amendment” he wants and all.
G-man
March 1, 2004 at 5:07 pm
3Adam, may I suggest another scenario that not only ties into your “It was all a big misunderstanding” point, but also clears up so much of the negative vibe (tsk tsk) about malintent on Bush’s part.
We are actually witnessing the most advanced production of relatity TV in history. Utterly ridiculous? Or utterly brilliant TV??!!
Marines (or at least heavily armed men appearing to be Marines) did in fact take Aristide out of Haiti against his will - but only so that the TLC network could send in the design team for its governence version of “While You Were Out”. Just imagine the ‘reaction shot’ we can all look forward to when Jean-Bertrand is let in on the gag and gets handed the shiny key to his NEW AND IMPROVED DEMOCRACY!!!
See, its gonna be just fine. And I hear that a much larger network is planning to do something similar in the U.S. in November. Except without the shiney key part.
Johnboy
March 1, 2004 at 5:33 pm
4Adam,
I was fascinated by your etymological brief exegesis based on Safire. An old friend holds two phd’s (Romance languages and library science) so I sent him your findings for evaluation.
His response just came back: we are both out of our
&$*#$ gourds. So much for that friendship. You wanna be my friend?
aaron
March 1, 2004 at 6:44 pm
5I miss Elian.
Bob
March 1, 2004 at 7:19 pm
6This kind of thing happens every time the Marines go on spring break.
Murray
March 1, 2004 at 8:07 pm
7Gee, I had no idea that Safire was so much fun.
I just assumed that he was a boring, rightwing, windbag. (Say that fast 3 times). I should read him more often.
A fourth scenario.
America fell down the rabbit hole and landed in Bizzaro Land in late 2000. The unpresident has an overpowering need to control every action world wide for his own political benefit. When things aren’t as clean as he would like, he relies on secrecy and the fact that Americans are too dull to understand the nuances of a coup verses a facilitated regime change.
Works for me.
Ibid
March 2, 2004 at 8:34 am
8“The Bush administration has demonstrated again and again that it’s willing to break a few eggs…”
… to deface the neighbors car.
jerry
March 2, 2004 at 9:59 am
9It’s a plausible thing that US Marines removed Aristide. We certainly have the capability.
Just keep in mind a couple of things:
1 - We have to take Aristide at his word to accept this premise. There is a credible argument that his election was a lie, frought with violent poll opposition and he was violently crushing his opposition.
2 - He’s being guarded by French soldiers. Is it not possible that France would want to make a lot of political hay on the internatinal scene if we did kidnap him?
3 - Haiti’s constitution is being supposedly used for the transfer of power. Aristide resigned and their Chief Justice of their supreme court has assumed power to reorganize and hold new elections.
the conserva-troll
Cat
March 2, 2004 at 11:05 am
10“Jerry the Conservatroll’s” comment is frought with dumbness. (Hi there, Mr. President!)
Anonymous
March 2, 2004 at 2:22 pm
11Cat, “dumbness” with 30% more “asshat” for free!
Jerry
March 3, 2004 at 5:01 am
12Dammit, yer right! A misunderstanding! That happened to me years ago when the cops pushed into my apartment, offered to rearrange all my furniture and then give me a ride to their place and put me up in a room furnished in Early Minimalist. I thought they were orders (the drawn guns and all that, ya know.) I was allowed to go home in just days when the cops realized they were ten blocks from where they were suppossed to go. Maybe Aristide will be allowed to go home in a few days when the Marines realize they were supposed to offer their services in Tabago or Martinique!
Jerry
March 3, 2004 at 5:12 am
13Snurf! There is another Jerry (jerry, the conserva-troll.) I’ll be the capitalized one. OK?Progressive.
But aren’t you going to get a bad rep with the right by using demonstrable fact and reasoned argument? Rush, Sean, Mike et. al. are ashamed of you and confused by your approach!
VAdem
March 3, 2004 at 11:25 am
14The final point is the telling one.
Miel
March 4, 2004 at 3:12 am
15I second this point:
“The problem is, Haiti has a constitution that like ours, dictates that the President serves a set term. In their case, 5 years.
So Aristide’s exit is not a good thing, but a coup against Haiti’s constitution.”
Why is it a good thing? The U.S. saying they would step in to preserve order–=or France…while leaving the current leadership intact would have been OK. Since when is it good for elected leaders to be removed by force? Wouldn’t it be better to use a legal process to call for new elections, etc.?
jerry
March 4, 2004 at 11:45 am
16Jerry,
I have always tried to use demonstrable fact and reasoned argument and never resorted calling people an “asshat” or any other name (by the way, I’ve always signed my posts with my real name a legitimate email address). Occasionally I’ve tried to even be humorous about it. I even pushed to be named Adam’s National Security Advisor for the Felber Cabinet.
Someone called me a conserva-troll last year or so and I thought it was funny so I adopted it.
I enjoy Adams work so this is one of my must-reads and has been for several years. I enjoy good debate and usually this site has proven to be visited by several intelligent people capable of such. Unfortuantely, like any site, it is also visited by the opposite.
jerry
the conserva-troll
Ras_Nesta
March 4, 2004 at 3:23 pm
17Awww…did I hurt poor widdle Jerry-the-self-described-troll’s feewings?
I’m soooo sorry that you feel bad that I don’t agree with your asshat theories.
Of course, the default troll fall-back is to make it seem that they are the aggrieved party, how some “meanies” like me ruin the trolling party for all of us “intelligent” debators.
Go back to Freeperland if you can’t take a joke, joke.
(BTW, who cares if you have a meaningless hotmail e-mail addy? Unless you give me your Social Security and credit card #s, I’ll never give your trolling the serious attention it deserves…Never mind, I think I’ll just do that anyway.
Pam Good
March 5, 2004 at 7:26 pm
18I just wanted to tell you that I think you’re one of the funniest people I’ve ever heard. You really make my Saturdays when I’m listening to “Wait, Wait…” Thanks for your wonderful gift!
Kate
March 11, 2004 at 12:10 am
19tess
There are no elves in Nutcracker. I’m thinking gingerbread cookies, though….