Comments on: Constitution, version 2.0 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/ America's favorite blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:09:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: daniel http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4099 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4099 i dont kno how u got this up while i was on the site, but I still dont agree with u. i dont kno how u got this up while i was on the site, but I still dont agree with u.

]]> by: sly http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4100 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4100 Thank god they're preserving the sanctity of marriage! How courageous! Now, what time is "My Big, Fat, Obnoxious Fiancé" on again? Thank god they’re preserving the sanctity of marriage! How courageous! Now, what time is “My Big, Fat, Obnoxious Fiancé” on again?

]]> by: KatherineW http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4101 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4101 Oh my gosh, this is TOO funny! And scary in how true it is. I can't believe that people keep trying to argue for the "sanctity of marriage" in the age of "Who Wants To Marry A Multi-Millionaire?", Britney Spears' 52-hour marriage and the Carmen Electra-Dennis Rodman debacle. I wish they could all understand that love is just love. Oh my gosh, this is TOO funny! And scary in how true it is. I can’t believe that people keep trying to argue for the “sanctity of marriage” in the age of “Who Wants To Marry A Multi-Millionaire?”, Britney Spears’ 52-hour marriage and the Carmen Electra-Dennis Rodman debacle. I wish they could all understand that love is just love.

]]> by: Neros http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4102 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4102 I am so happy that in the face of God we are all equal. Well, except those right-winged christian fellars who are a little bit more than the rest of us, and thus are able to influence the Man (who is probably a boy mentally), to make this religious jugdement something political. Ahh, yes.. America, land of the idiots who elected Bush Jnr..;) I am so happy that in the face of God we are all equal. Well, except those right-winged christian fellars who are a little bit more than the rest of us, and thus are able to influence the Man (who is probably a boy mentally), to make this religious jugdement something political.

Ahh, yes.. America, land of the idiots who elected Bush Jnr..;)

]]> by: tim http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4103 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4103 And if you think the Preamble 2.0 has a lot of parenthetical asides, you ought to see the First Amendment 2.0. And if you think the Preamble 2.0 has a lot of parenthetical asides, you ought to see the First Amendment 2.0.

]]> by: Chris http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4104 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4104 The good news is that this amendment crap is likely to totally alienate Bush to a lot of voters. And aside from a few vocal religious conservatives, I doubt it will really motivate his base. The good news is that this amendment crap is likely to totally alienate Bush to a lot of voters. And aside from a few vocal religious conservatives, I doubt it will really motivate his base.

]]> by: Lachlan http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4105 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4105 I think I wet myself trying not to guffaw at work! Amen, Mr. Felber. We gotta laugh at the absurdity of it all. I mean, jeez, my partner and I are SO DANGEROUS to the fabric of marriage, since we work 3 jobs between us, adore our cat, watch movies, read books, and pretty much do the same things that the rest of the country does. Aren't you scared? I can feel the pall of fear settling upon the land now, mwahahahaha! I think I wet myself trying not to guffaw at work!

Amen, Mr. Felber. We gotta laugh at the absurdity of it all. I mean, jeez, my partner and I are SO DANGEROUS to the fabric of marriage, since we work 3 jobs between us, adore our cat, watch movies, read books, and pretty much do the same things that the rest of the country does.

Aren’t you scared? I can feel the pall of fear settling upon the land now, mwahahahaha!

]]> by: aaron http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4106 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4106 Adam, haven't you been listening?!?! This ammendment is NOT meant to discriminate against gays, it's to protect our laws against ACTIVIST JUDGES!!! In fact, I'm pretty sure I have yet to hear a single ammendment-backer even say the words "gay," "lesbian," "same-sex" or "homosexual" throughout this entire debate. Clearly, this ammendment has nothing to do with discrimination at all. It's simply going stop a group of people deemed inferior from doing something everyone else can do. What's discriminatory about that? Adam, haven’t you been listening?!?!

This ammendment is NOT meant to discriminate against gays, it’s to protect our laws against ACTIVIST JUDGES!!! In fact, I’m pretty sure I have yet to hear a single ammendment-backer even say the words “gay,” “lesbian,” “same-sex” or “homosexual” throughout this entire debate.

Clearly, this ammendment has nothing to do with discrimination at all. It’s simply going stop a group of people deemed inferior from doing something everyone else can do. What’s discriminatory about that?

]]> by: tess http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4107 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4107 as long as we don't get into another argument with someone else who's seemingly pro-bush but professes to dislike the man. i'm too tired to argue today. as long as we don’t get into another argument with someone else who’s seemingly pro-bush but professes to dislike the man. i’m too tired to argue today.

]]> by: Erik http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4108 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/25/constitution-version-20/#comment-4108 Indeed. <a>Mark Ludovich has a more concise version, as well.</a> Indeed.

Mark Ludovich has a more concise version, as well.

]]>