<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strengths and Vulnerabilities</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ken, Just Ken...</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3974</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3974</guid>
					<description>P.S.
As for the President's National Guard Service; Tell them that nearly 4 years as Commander and chief of the whole millitary surely makes up for his alleged time off in 1973.

Heck, he's taken more vacation time while being President than he's supposed to have missed in the Guard...  and nobody's saying he's A.W.O.L. now. Right?

(Somebody ask legal about that. They can't, can they?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.<br />
As for the President&#8217;s National Guard Service; Tell them that nearly 4 years as Commander and chief of the whole millitary surely makes up for his alleged time off in 1973.</p>
<p>Heck, he&#8217;s taken more vacation time while being President than he&#8217;s supposed to have missed in the Guard&#8230;  and nobody&#8217;s saying he&#8217;s A.W.O.L. now. Right?</p>
<p>(Somebody ask legal about that. They can&#8217;t, can they?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3975</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3975</guid>
					<description>P.P.S. 
Always remember, if you control the language you control the issue.

"Clear Skies" was our initiative to let power companies dispose of those pesky pollutants into the air.
"Healthy Forests" was where we let timber companies cut all the trees they wanted.
"Death tax" was some one gets a windfall fortune and doesn't have to pay taxes on it.
"Operation Iraqi freedom" We remove a dictator and install an occupying force.

You get the idea. Besides the democrats always roll over dead if we yell loud enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.P.S.<br />
Always remember, if you control the language you control the issue.</p>
<p>&#8220;Clear Skies&#8221; was our initiative to let power companies dispose of those pesky pollutants into the air.<br />
&#8220;Healthy Forests&#8221; was where we let timber companies cut all the trees they wanted.<br />
&#8220;Death tax&#8221; was some one gets a windfall fortune and doesn&#8217;t have to pay taxes on it.<br />
&#8220;Operation Iraqi freedom&#8221; We remove a dictator and install an occupying force.</p>
<p>You get the idea. Besides the democrats always roll over dead if we yell loud enough.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3976</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3976</guid>
					<description>Almost forgot.
Be sure to get all of our media friends to continue to start every story on the democrats by saying that however good they are, and however much they are liked by the public, they can't be elected. 

See what it did for Dean? If they keep pounding it home, those idiot voters will buy it.

Talk about stupid! We got blue collar workers to support a tax policy that increases their share while cutting our friends amount.

Just because Americans want what’s good for them, is no reason to give it to them. All we need to do is give them the words they want to hear.

Words, that's all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost forgot.<br />
Be sure to get all of our media friends to continue to start every story on the democrats by saying that however good they are, and however much they are liked by the public, they can&#8217;t be elected. </p>
<p>See what it did for Dean? If they keep pounding it home, those idiot voters will buy it.</p>
<p>Talk about stupid! We got blue collar workers to support a tax policy that increases their share while cutting our friends amount.</p>
<p>Just because Americans want what’s good for them, is no reason to give it to them. All we need to do is give them the words they want to hear.</p>
<p>Words, that&#8217;s all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ras_Nesta</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3977</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3977</guid>
					<description>Don't forget the "Look out!  Terrorist under every pot!" strength Bush plays with such conviction.

Conviction?  I wouldn't Plame ya'...

Worst. President. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the &#8220;Look out!  Terrorist under every pot!&#8221; strength Bush plays with such conviction.</p>
<p>Conviction?  I wouldn&#8217;t Plame ya&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Worst. President. Ever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pissed off</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3978</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3978</guid>
					<description>You are all a bunch of assholes.  Each and every one of you.  You and GWB can all go to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all a bunch of assholes.  Each and every one of you.  You and GWB can all go to hell.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dee</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3979</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3979</guid>
					<description>Well that just tears it.  I've resisted for the last year and a half but now it's official.  


Irony is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that just tears it.  I&#8217;ve resisted for the last year and a half but now it&#8217;s official.  </p>
<p>Irony is dead.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pissed on</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3980</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3980</guid>
					<description>Anyone see my brother Pissed off around here? He got out of the basement and we're a little worried he might hurt himself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone see my brother Pissed off around here? He got out of the basement and we&#8217;re a little worried he might hurt himself&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Low level staffer</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3981</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3981</guid>
					<description>To: Mr Rove
Fr: A Low Level Staffer
Re: How we can get stronger

I've got an idea that can kill two birds with one stone.  Let's increase the casualties in Iraq.  Hang with me on this one.  The more soldiers who die in combat it becomes more obvious how dangerous the enemy is and how important it is that we have a 'war president' to protect us.  

But that's not the real bonus.  The real bonus is that most of the casualties will be Reservists on active duty, not regular Army.  These aren't true patriots.  These men and women are holding jobs in the mainland while they are away in the Middle East.  How fair is that?  If you want a job in Alabama or wherever, you should stay in Alabama, not go off to Iraq or Afghanistan.  If these people don't come back to the mainland, it frees up the jobs for hard working Americans.

After all, isn't that what this election is all about?  Creating jobs?  If we can't create new ones, maybe we can create new vacancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: Mr Rove<br />
Fr: A Low Level Staffer<br />
Re: How we can get stronger</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got an idea that can kill two birds with one stone.  Let&#8217;s increase the casualties in Iraq.  Hang with me on this one.  The more soldiers who die in combat it becomes more obvious how dangerous the enemy is and how important it is that we have a &#8216;war president&#8217; to protect us.  </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the real bonus.  The real bonus is that most of the casualties will be Reservists on active duty, not regular Army.  These aren&#8217;t true patriots.  These men and women are holding jobs in the mainland while they are away in the Middle East.  How fair is that?  If you want a job in Alabama or wherever, you should stay in Alabama, not go off to Iraq or Afghanistan.  If these people don&#8217;t come back to the mainland, it frees up the jobs for hard working Americans.</p>
<p>After all, isn&#8217;t that what this election is all about?  Creating jobs?  If we can&#8217;t create new ones, maybe we can create new vacancies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken, Just Ken...</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3982</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3982</guid>
					<description>Hey Adam, 

Any chance of setting up some sort of minimum sense of humor/satire requirement test for posting here?

On second thought, don't do it.  

I'm afraid I might not pass, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam, </p>
<p>Any chance of setting up some sort of minimum sense of humor/satire requirement test for posting here?</p>
<p>On second thought, don&#8217;t do it.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I might not pass, either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tess</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3983</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/16/strengths-and-vulnerabilities/#comment-3983</guid>
					<description>shouldn't the war on terror bit read:

"War on Terror - you know, we gotta wheel out you-know-who at just the right time or else the shock'll wear off and people'll remember all over again that we're the greediest war-profiteers the likes of which the world hasn't seen since the Reconstruction after the Civil War (Mr. President, we'll have someone brief you on it since we all know you were too drunk to remember anything from beyond middle school)."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shouldn&#8217;t the war on terror bit read:</p>
<p>&#8220;War on Terror - you know, we gotta wheel out you-know-who at just the right time or else the shock&#8217;ll wear off and people&#8217;ll remember all over again that we&#8217;re the greediest war-profiteers the likes of which the world hasn&#8217;t seen since the Reconstruction after the Civil War (Mr. President, we&#8217;ll have someone brief you on it since we all know you were too drunk to remember anything from beyond middle school).&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
