<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Overly-Hasty Entry</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: t.a.</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3971</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3971</guid>
					<description>i think dean decided that since the other campaigns have coopted so much of his message, he might as well hang around so people can hear the original.  and while the kerry mistress story may not pan out, the overall increase in kerry coverage (and isn't it about time we had more alliterative opportunities in politics?) may bring his alleged electability into question (since it was originally conjured out of thin air).  i'm certainly hoping we turn things around wisconsin.  i have severe doubts about kerry surviving a rove onslaught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think dean decided that since the other campaigns have coopted so much of his message, he might as well hang around so people can hear the original.  and while the kerry mistress story may not pan out, the overall increase in kerry coverage (and isn&#8217;t it about time we had more alliterative opportunities in politics?) may bring his alleged electability into question (since it was originally conjured out of thin air).  i&#8217;m certainly hoping we turn things around wisconsin.  i have severe doubts about kerry surviving a rove onslaught.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ananna</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3972</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3972</guid>
					<description>I really want to see Dean at the convention. He probably will have enough delegates to get a chance to speak, and I think he will put on a great show for the audience and invigorate everyone. His message brings the Democratic party a little bit closer to its roots, and away from the Republican-lite that it has become, and I personally think that's a good thing. Not being Republican-lite, that is.

Plus, if Dean shows up at the convention, it might keep some of Dean's supporters interested enough to stick with the election thing through to November. Maybe Dean will support the nominee at that point, after he's had his say in front of the Democratic leadership. I can't see him throwing support behind Kerry until he gets his say in the platform, assuming that a Democratic president gets elected, Dean wants to make sure that Kerry stays honest and at least Democratic enough to make people want to vote for another Democratic candidate again after Kerry's eight years. :)

I would love to see some more stringent rules against media conglomeration written into the Democratic platform, which Dean was presenting (and which was a big factor in what killed him). Maybe some tweaking to the campaign finance reform plank, or adding one if we don't have one. I imagine that's what Dean is holding out for. So, he wants to get as many delegates as he can get, even if its not enough to win the nomination.

Sure would be nice to see a pro-Gay Marriage plank thrown in there too. But that's not likely to happen, which is sad, because the Dems are going to find themselves caught up in the undertow when everyone realizes that the tidal wave of same sex marriages isn't going to stop. The "Marriage Protection" constitutional amendments are going to fail, or if they pass, it's just going to lead to another 21st amendment. It would be nice if history showed that the Democratic party was part of it, and had the spine to stick up for it. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.

Sorry, that wasn't funny at all, unless you're a regular Free Republic reader, and even then we'll see who gets the last laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to see Dean at the convention. He probably will have enough delegates to get a chance to speak, and I think he will put on a great show for the audience and invigorate everyone. His message brings the Democratic party a little bit closer to its roots, and away from the Republican-lite that it has become, and I personally think that&#8217;s a good thing. Not being Republican-lite, that is.</p>
<p>Plus, if Dean shows up at the convention, it might keep some of Dean&#8217;s supporters interested enough to stick with the election thing through to November. Maybe Dean will support the nominee at that point, after he&#8217;s had his say in front of the Democratic leadership. I can&#8217;t see him throwing support behind Kerry until he gets his say in the platform, assuming that a Democratic president gets elected, Dean wants to make sure that Kerry stays honest and at least Democratic enough to make people want to vote for another Democratic candidate again after Kerry&#8217;s eight years. <img src='http://fanaticalapathy.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I would love to see some more stringent rules against media conglomeration written into the Democratic platform, which Dean was presenting (and which was a big factor in what killed him). Maybe some tweaking to the campaign finance reform plank, or adding one if we don&#8217;t have one. I imagine that&#8217;s what Dean is holding out for. So, he wants to get as many delegates as he can get, even if its not enough to win the nomination.</p>
<p>Sure would be nice to see a pro-Gay Marriage plank thrown in there too. But that&#8217;s not likely to happen, which is sad, because the Dems are going to find themselves caught up in the undertow when everyone realizes that the tidal wave of same sex marriages isn&#8217;t going to stop. The &#8220;Marriage Protection&#8221; constitutional amendments are going to fail, or if they pass, it&#8217;s just going to lead to another 21st amendment. It would be nice if history showed that the Democratic party was part of it, and had the spine to stick up for it. You can&#8217;t put the genie back in the bottle.</p>
<p>Sorry, that wasn&#8217;t funny at all, unless you&#8217;re a regular Free Republic reader, and even then we&#8217;ll see who gets the last laugh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tim</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3973</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/02/14/another-overly-hasty-entry/#comment-3973</guid>
					<description>So Dean is keeping his campaign alive based on reports by Matt Drudge.  With decision-making based on that level of intelligence, it sounds to me like Dean really is presidential!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Dean is keeping his campaign alive based on reports by Matt Drudge.  With decision-making based on that level of intelligence, it sounds to me like Dean really is presidential!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
