Returning home from a lunch meeting this afternoon, I was pleased to see that Fanatical Apathy had drawn in quite a few readers. About twice the normal amount for this time of day. “Egad,” I thought, “I must have obtained a link from some noted personage who enjoyed my cogent and breezy political analyses or my rather waggish turns of phrase…” [I have a strict rule that my inner voice always express itself with the diction of a Victorian gentleman. I suspect that in this way I am not unlike Joe Eszterhas.] Further investigation proved, however, that this was not the case.
They’re here for the boobies. Specifically, the right boobie of Ms. J. Jackson. And that’s not exactly the kind of attention I want.
[Note: From this point on, I will attempt to discuss the matter using language that will not register on the web searches of those in search of prurient material, celebrity-related or otherwise…]
Yesterday, you may note, I referred in passing to the now notorious baring of Michael’s sister’s bosom [See? I bet NOBODY types “bosom” into a search engine!] The hundreds of hits soon followed.
The real reason I’m on about it today, though, is that a full-scale FCC investigation into the entire halftime show is now underway. FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell said, “The whole performance was onstage copulation… This really crossed a heinous line.”
Oddly, FCC Chairman Michael Powell also recently argued against “graying rules of a bygone black-and-white era”.” And he said that things should “evolve in a regulation-free zone.” Of course, in those instances he was talking about (1) allowing massive media conglomerates to become more massive than even Congress is comfortable with, and (2) allowing telecoms to pursue internet phone schemes tax-free. It’s not that Powell’s against a free, wanton and wild dance, it’s just a matter of whom he’s dancing with.

[”Grab some a’ THIS bandwidth, baby!” Michael K. Powell lets CBS chief
Les Moonves take a few liberties at the administration’s 2004 “Halftime Spectacular.”]
It’s the basic liberal/conservative question of whether our government should occupy itself regulating gigantic corporations or morality. Me, I think the spectacle that led to hootergate was a little raw for family fare. The phone calls that went in to CBS, the public outrage, and the multitudinous groveling apologies make it pretty clear that you’re not going to see anything raunchier than Kenny G. playing a medley from “Oklahoma” at any Super Bowl for the next decade. In other words, that market genuinely is regulating itself, while the aspects of communications that Powell’s FCC should be spending its time and money on regulating are becoming a modern Gommorrah of corporate rapine. And like any wanton harlot, all it took was a few bucks for the Bush administration to invite big media to rip away its last flimsy layers of lacy, underwired protection and support, exposing the soft, bountiful goodness of America’s… you get the idea.
*Whew.* So, I guess if you came here seeking the real obscenity surrounding the infamous halftime show, you’ve found it. But if you’re looking for unadulterated glimpses of a certain silly bit of latter-day burlesque (and a curiously instructive lesson in fluid dynamics vis-à-vis modern corsetry), well, that’s what the “Back” button is for.





20 comments
wild eyed radical
February 3, 2004 at 7:28 pm
1So unknown government entities can “out” CIA operatives, the President can start a war based on “faulty intelligence” (arranged at his behest when he first arrived in office and demanded somebody find a way to get him his war), education and environmental funding can be slashed while billions are given to friends of the Vice President. No problem! But if somebody’s gimmicky tear-away costume fails onstage, that requires a full scale governmental investigation.
Is satire even possible anymore?
Murray
February 3, 2004 at 7:39 pm
2Ohhh, and I was hoping for digitally enhanced streaming video.
Jay
February 3, 2004 at 8:33 pm
3Perhaps I’m just an old fogey, but I’m surprised there hasn’t been more outrage about Kid Rock’s abuse of the flag. He first came on stage wearing an American flag that had been split down the middle to create a hole for his head. When he was done with it, it was unceremoniously dumped in a heap on the platform where the drummer was sitting. I missed Ms. Jackson’s exposed [insert search engine proof euphemism here] because between Nelly’s crotch grabbing and the mistreatment of the flag, I decided that washing dishes was a more productive use of my time.
Dave
February 3, 2004 at 9:59 pm
4“Think of the children!” Where’s Reverend Lovejoy’s wife when you need her. Boobs! there I said it, now your site will get a bazillion hits. All of those children are scarred forever by seeing a boob? In Europe boobs are a common site on TV.
Of course a couple of weeks ago during the evening news ABC showed the graphic gun camera footage of an attack helicopter killing two Iraqi men. Investigation or righteous pomposity… of course not. That was merely the ending of two human lives during the dinner hour in a very violent, destructive manner (cool), not a brief far shot of a human boob (destructive, and obscene).
G-Man
February 4, 2004 at 2:03 am
5Congrats are in order for Dubya and his ability to lead by example! Really, ya gotta give credit when its so richly deserved! Therefore, I say, “Kudos to Bush appointees who, within moments of a screamingly obvious breakdown in command and control, demand answers and promise swift punishment of rougue elements who overstep their authority and violate not only our laws, but our cherished beliefs of what America is all about.”
And just because Chairman Powell’s lightening-fast diatribe wasn’t aimed at violations of national security, intelligence manipulation, or incestuous energy policy-making, in the words of our president, “What’s the difference”. Its a damn fine start.
Having now witnessd the FCC’s inspiring act of public service, what’s next for the Bushies? Well, I can’t disclose how I know this, but don’t be surprised if in the coming days you learn about a covert operation code named SMALL PACKAGE. This highly secretive operation was initiated immediately after the SOTU and is being conducted by hand-picked group of specialists known, on the inside, as the Steriod Survey Group. The SSG’s unilaterally defined objective is to uncover and destroy all the Weapons of MASS Development in Barry Bond’s medicine cabinet.
Tonight, let’s all say a prayer of thanks for the deliverance from certain peril of the indisputable pillars of US life: football AND baseball.
VT Elitist
February 4, 2004 at 9:08 am
6Perhaps John Ashcroft could be persuaded to buy a curtain like he did for the statue of Lady Justice? It could be erected around all future half-time shows. Thus ensuring no one is offended by content.
As any good conservative knows, this country needs more violence and no sex in our entertainment. That way we can kill each other and not procreate thereby saving the earth from certain doom at our hands.
Chicory
February 4, 2004 at 9:52 am
7This is definitely “Much Ado About Nothing” (or, rather little)”
Dugrless
February 4, 2004 at 10:39 am
8What is this? I typed “wanton harlot” into Google and I get this site?
Pat R.
February 4, 2004 at 11:10 am
9You don’t think “wanton harlot” seems appropriate here? I don’t know — my wantonness has moved quite some distance toward out-and-out harlotry since I began spending time in this corner of the web.
upyernoz
February 4, 2004 at 12:17 pm
10admit it adam, the entire point of this post is to further increase your boobie hits
JK
February 4, 2004 at 12:32 pm
11Reminds me of a recent piece on NPR about the movie “Chicago.” Anti-tobacco activists were outraged by all the smoking that went on in that movie…but never mentioned the string of murderers, guns, etc…
But then people frequently tell me my priorities are out of order.
Anonymous
February 4, 2004 at 1:01 pm
12Dave,
“X is common in Europe” is not an argument for or against anything. It’s just a statement of fact. I hope you aren’t committing that tedious fallacy of begging the question. Does “common in Europe” always equal “good”?
tess
February 4, 2004 at 1:47 pm
13well, i’m more irritated that the mammary gland in question has gotten more press coverage than the bush proposed budget. says a lot about americans, doesn’t it?
besides, most of us were (or should’ve been) breast-fed, so what’s the big deal about showing a boob now and then? and it’s not as though cultures where women go about topless most of the time have men walking around with giant erections at the sight — they’re used to it. so let’s all just calm down and go back to what’s really at stake — the future of internet porn, and how showing it on network tv is undermining that all-important market that fuels our economy!
Bryan
February 4, 2004 at 4:13 pm
14“The effect on the children”, uh, some of the younger ones got hungry?
Months to investigate the Plame leak, hours to investigate showing a cover sheet on the O’Neill interview, minutes to investigate a “?costume malfunction?”. Oh, yes, we really have our priorities straight.
Jack K.
February 4, 2004 at 5:46 pm
15…wow…
…pretty interesting site you have here. I was just googling “heinous onstage copulation NPR Game Show Carl Castle”…you know, to see if I could find some Janet Jackson halftime photos and…well…this was the first site that came up…
…wierd…
Corwin Haught
February 5, 2004 at 11:33 am
16The last name’s Kassell.
Landis
February 5, 2004 at 1:10 pm
17Bryan:
Are you saying we should be spending more time investigating the wardrobe malfunction and less on Plame-gate? Maybe seconds on “What did Bush know and when did he know it” (Iraq & WMDs) and nanoseconds on 9/11 intelligence failures…
Mommie
February 6, 2004 at 11:53 am
18Thing is, the most distressing thing re: the errant boob, is that now there’ll be 30 second/60 second delays on everything on network TV.
This will be for Decency. But it will be a farewell to spontaneity.
sigh
And yet the gaseous horse was on tape. And so was the crotch-biting dog. Oh. I see. That was different. That was funny…at least I guess someone thought so. And so if the horse or the dog attacked the dominitrix bodice and the boob escaped, it would be OK?
My head hurts.
Rana
February 6, 2004 at 4:39 pm
19What I don’t understand is why it mostly seems to be “Janet Janet Janet and her obscene boob.” What about Timberlake? That breast was quietly minding its own business until he came along.
BettieWheelie
February 16, 2004 at 4:05 pm
20Television schmelevision. Public radio is good entertainment. And books. Books! And long walks on the beach and candlelit dinners and possible LTRs.