DES MOINES, Iowa (Reuters) - The Democratic presidential contenders clashed sharply over race in the final debate before the Iowa caucuses on Sunday, with civil rights activist Al Sharpton challenging front-runner Howard Dean’s record as Vermont governor.
Barely a week before the Jan. 19 caucuses kick off the Democratic contest for the White House, Dean conceded under questions from Sharpton that he did not have a black or Hispanic in his six-member Cabinet during more than 11 years as governor.
_________________________________________________
Back in Vermont, an enraged black community welcomed Sharpton’s words as finally exposing a long-ignored problem.
“I don’t know if I’d say I was ‘enraged,’” fumed local civil rights activist Reginald Coldpeck, “and I’m not really much of a civil rights activist. See, I’m a science teacher, so I don’t think I’d want the job. And my wife’s a veterinarian. Maybe you could ask that guy in Burlington if HE wants the job.”
In Burlington, there were echoes of the Coldpeck’s rage. “Honestly, this is no big deal,” said Bryan Cummings. “Maybe I coulda used the job back in ‘97 when I was unemployed, but I’d question whether my background in custom-made furniture would make me qualified.”
Shockingly, most of Vermont’s other black residents have been intimidated into silence over this issue. Cummings had a theory as to why: “Seriously, it’s just me and that couple in Bennington, there’re no other black people here,” he explained, voicing the anger of a silenced population.
Back in Bennington, fully 2/3rds of the state’s black population turned out to march towards the state house to protest their former governor’s racially biased policy.
“Really, my wife and I are just heading to the mall, it’s not a march” fumed Reginald Coldpeck. “In fact, could you please leave us alone?” Even through their rage, the march was conducted peacefully, with quiet, wounded dignity.





52 comments
Murray
January 12, 2004 at 10:32 am
1Given that the black population of VT is about 3 or 4% the larger minority of left handed, autistic, lesbians has a bigger gripe. Even though they had two members on Deans senior staff, there were none in his cabinet. How can Dean be so insensitive to the feelings of this important group?
Ken
January 12, 2004 at 1:20 pm
2When asked for comment on the issue, the State’s most famous resident, bed and breakfast proprietor Robert Newhart had this to say: “It’s cold outside! Want some maple syrup? Whatever happened to Suzzane Pleshette? And Larry, who looked like that guy from Blade Runner? What was the question again?”
Don
January 12, 2004 at 2:03 pm
3I, and my fellow members of the Minority Community are OUTRAGED!
Oh, wait.
I’m Caucasian (Swedish/Norwegian/Danish/French/English - I think that’s all).
Does that qualify me to be an Outraged Minority?
I do know that I am Outraged.
I just can’t remember specifically why at times.
There are just so many things.
Susie
January 12, 2004 at 5:40 pm
4So true!
When I lived in Vermont I got a serious case of white out… Not trying to be touchy feely, but I’d honestly come back to the NY area on vacation and just find every non-white face strange & beautiful.
I also found I had to stop myself from saying hello to evey black person on the streets of NYC, because in Vermont I really did know every black person (living in the 3rd largest city in Vermont)… and it was less than 10 for sure.
John Isbell
January 12, 2004 at 5:58 pm
5Brilliant. I am outraged at my lack of outrage.
Ras_Nesta
January 12, 2004 at 7:06 pm
6The weird thing is that Sharpton defended Dean at the NAACP debate when he was asked if he would have “high-ranking” minorities in his cabinet.
Maybe Al was in a bad mood…or just being Al and playing the race card. Carol kicked his ass pretty handily.
NCDem
January 12, 2004 at 9:09 pm
7you guys are coming across as clue fucking less…
bgm
January 12, 2004 at 9:17 pm
8seems to me that Mr. Sharpton is doing a deal with another candidate on this one … strange how Sharpton is silent on a putative ‘issue’ like this in different locales and times, but vociferous at others.
the fact that Vermont is a nearly all-white state seems not to be considered by Sharpton.
well, like someone said, Sharpton’s histrionics have all the weight of an angry flea attacking a big, strong mule.
Jack
January 12, 2004 at 9:49 pm
9Yo, NCDem! No saying such things to the people here without providing evidence for your case.
Seems like you had a Pickler with that sandwich.
Katie
January 12, 2004 at 10:47 pm
10Adam,
When I read just the title of today’s article, I said to my computer, “All 3 of them?!”
ROFLMAO to discover that we came up with exactly the same satistical count.
-=e=-
January 12, 2004 at 11:07 pm
11Hilarious! Great post….
However, I’m outraged because… uhm, well… honestly, I forgot why. It’ll come back to me later, I’m sure.
'nuther NC Dem
January 12, 2004 at 11:21 pm
12Yeah NC Dem. Clue us in, homeboy. Esse quam videri, compadre. Don’t want these folks thinking we-all is a bunch of smartass trolltalking rednecks…
I’ve been wondering who Sharpton was really talking to - was he giving lip-service to his financial base? He is obviously not tired of being divided by race. It ain’t like he could climb out of last place. No reason to get in Dean’s face. Made me want to reach for the mace…
We definitely have to take back the Democratic Party, before we even think about taking our country back.
k
January 12, 2004 at 11:43 pm
13Murray, actually the percentage of blacks in Vermont in the 2000 census was 0.5%, and 0.9% for Hispanics. But somehow Sharpton thinks they should have had 17% of Dean’s cabinet?
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/50000.html
lurker
January 13, 2004 at 1:50 am
14you guys are coming across as clue fucking less…
i agree. want some facts? get your head out of your ass and look around
Anonymous
January 13, 2004 at 1:55 am
15I, and my fellow members of the Minority Community are OUTRAGED BY BIGOTRY!
Oh, wait.
I’m Caucasian (Irish- mostly).
Does that qualify me to be an Outraged Minority?
I do know that I am Outraged.
I can remember specifically why at times.
There are so many things.
(grow up white boy, you cant be god forever).
buddhistMonkey
January 13, 2004 at 3:03 am
16Actually, Howard Dean tried very hard to appoint minorities to positions of power in his administration, but because of the racial makeup of Vermont, there were few to be found. Some even turned him down, because most government jobs in Vermont are part-time work. Click my name for the article “Dean tried to appoint minorities in Vermont” in today’s Salon.
yank_in_london
January 13, 2004 at 6:20 am
17I think an interesting point has been raised. As a radical left-hander I want to know how many southpaws Dean had on his staff and in his cabinet!
Pat R.
January 13, 2004 at 6:32 am
18Thanks to K. and buddhistMonkey for providing access to info. NCDem and Lurker: time to get a life.
Camilo
January 13, 2004 at 8:45 am
19And it is the demographic make up of VT what keeps people away (and the cold!): Latinos, I know, have rejected professional job offers there, because there is no Latino community. So, it is a structural problem, but nothing that would enrage minorities!
lurker
January 13, 2004 at 10:11 am
20though i agree that al was being offhanded with dean, i dont agree with all the outright racist attitudes on this comments. i started thinking that i stumbled upon a KKKs for Dean site.
I, and my fellow members of the Minority Community are OUTRAGED BY BIGOTRY!
Chris
January 13, 2004 at 10:24 am
21Lurker,
‘KKK for Dean’ site? Please link. I suppose Howard made the site himself, or at least asked for their endorsement, right?
“want some facts? get your head out of your ass and look around”
Amazing how I never thought to do that! *removes head from ass; is overwhelmed with facts*
Anonymous
January 13, 2004 at 10:30 am
22OK, and in re: the odd and I do mean very, ‘lurker’ comment, I suppose stats will also show that this comment’s column has 1.0 percent trolls.
Hey! Speaking about oppressed minorities, why does no one speak up for the Troll, without whom the internet would be - uhm… a lot better?
best,
Georgettethegood who knows a Troll when she sniffs one
Hieronymus Braintree
January 13, 2004 at 10:36 am
23You know, when you really think about it, Al Sharpton has done more for the civil rights movement than Rush Limbaugh and Trent Lott put together.
Clearly the Democratic party owes him, especially when it comes to getting out the vote. And, naturally, Sharpton is right when he complains about how the Democratic party has come to take the black vote for granted.
You know what I wish Sharpton would do? I wish he’d call the Democratics’ bluff and join the Republicans. Boy, oh boy. That’d show ‘em, huh?
Chris
January 13, 2004 at 10:56 am
24Whooops, I misread lurker’s sentence: “i started thinking that i stumbled upon a KKKs for Dean site.”
Er…you found us out.
We also mock and degrade soldiers.
John Isbell
January 13, 2004 at 10:58 am
25Hieronymus, that’s the black political dilemma. Vote Dem and get shat on sometimes, with nice words, or GOP and get shat on programmatically, with occasional nice words. American Indians have a dilemma too. Vote Dem: and remind them it’s OK by you.
Signed, Master of the Obvious.
Anonymous
January 13, 2004 at 11:20 am
26I thought it was too bad that Dean tried to evade the question. I would have liked to hear:
Sharpton: “Howard, did you have any African-Americans in your cabinet?”
Dean: “No”
Malleus Maleficarum
January 13, 2004 at 11:39 am
27I love how Hannity is suddenly all for Affirmative Action programs just because Dean’s state happened to have an insufficient minority population from which to place Cabinet members, and that its Clinton’s fault for not putting any minorities in his Presidential cabinet.
Here’s what I don’t understand; why is this even a GD issue? Ooh, Sharpton forced Dean to admit there were no blacks in his gubernatorial cabinet. SFW!
VT Elitist
January 13, 2004 at 11:50 am
28Discrimination occurs where people compete for limited resources and where there is opportunity for culture clash. We don’t discriminate because we don’t have the opportunity to! Seriously, most Vermonters can go weeks without seeing a minority. Calling Dean on not appointing a representative of a minority group that accounts for 0.5% of the population to one of six cabinet posts is ludicrous.
OContrair
January 13, 2004 at 12:33 pm
29Think about this - if Dean had gone all-out to put a black in his cabinet simply to fill a quota, Vermont might have had their own Clarence Thomas!
My question is why does the press dutifully report this nonsense every time Sharpton flaps his gums? It’s not like he’s even slightly competing in this race.
Pat R.
January 13, 2004 at 12:51 pm
30Hmmm… K. hasn’t made a return appearance. Could be he/she went and got a life.
Your turn, Lurker.
RP
January 13, 2004 at 12:58 pm
31Lies! Lies! There’s no mall in Bennington!
VT Elitist
January 13, 2004 at 1:00 pm
32Sharpton provides a voice for minorities. It may not sound as sweet as one would like, but it at least provides counterpoint to the primary voices. That keeps us all honest and more representative of our country than the other Party. punctus contra punctum
The theme of the debate was race. Sharpton’s question was on topic. Dean fumbled it. As a Vermonter and a Dean supported, I was a bit disappointed by that.
I would hate to see the neo-cons use race against the Democrats. I would also hate to see us take on positions that smacked of racist to counter their suddenly pro-Sharpton attitude. Never let your opponent choose your position for you.
Murray
January 13, 2004 at 1:49 pm
33I listened to Sharpton for an hour on the radio yesterday (Dianne Rheem show). The incident was played and Al was asked about it. What struck me most was that Al said that Howard, afterward, came over to him to discuss the problem and get Al’s advice on how to deal with it. Al admitted that he was impressed with how Howard had handled the whole thing.
It really impressed me too.
As for Trolls
As an undergraduate I went to a small college near Chicago and our team was called the Trolls. We were even mentioned in US News and World Report as one of the 10 weirdest named teams. (Banana Slugs got first). Trinity Christian College was a very philosophy oriented school and the small athletic department was sort of looked down on. The school made the mistake of having the students vote on the name and tried to push Tigers. Because the school was so small (46 in my graduating class) it was easy to get an underground movement and the write-in vote of Trolls won.
So I’m a bit ambivalent when trolls are called trolls. On the other hand I have no problem at all being a Wolverine.
adam
January 13, 2004 at 2:08 pm
34To my mind, Sharpton’s attack was unfair, both in its wording (which distinguished between senior administration senior staff in order to make Dean’s record more damning) and its implication. I don’t think that calling him on that “smacks of racism.”
That said, I don’t think Shaprton’s a jerk for asking the question, but it was an unnecessarily aggressive manner of doing so. And the readily-available population statistics from Vermont make me suspect that Shaprton might have known this, and that the attack was more political than substantive.
In fact, I didn’t know about the Hannity thing when I wrote this entry - I’d woken up, read the article about the debate, whipped up my response, and 15 minutes later I was out the door and headin’ for a reading.
Here’s the question from Sharpton (italics mine):
“I direct this to Governor Dean. You keep talking about race. In the state of Vermont, when you were governor, ‘97 ‘99, 2001, not one black or brown held a senior policy position. Not one. You yourself said we must do something about it. Nothing was done. Can you explain, since now you want to convene everyone to talk about race, it seems as though you’ve discovered blacks and browns during this campaign, how you can explain not one black or brown working for your administration as governor?”
VT Elitist
January 13, 2004 at 2:18 pm
35“it seems as though you’ve discovered blacks and browns during this campaign” combined with the .05% population seems to explain it all. Just kidding.
Robert George
January 13, 2004 at 2:35 pm
36Adam, you’re not going to whitewash Dean’s record that easily! Dean admitted that their are six offices in the Vermont Cabinet. That’s one office per Vermont black person! Dean clearly didn’t do enough! Even if you are some kind of comedian, It’s beyond the pale that you would support this scandal through easily-pierced mockery! Never darken my computer screen again!! Thank goodness at least one honorable man such as Al Sharpton raised a hue and cry over this outrage!
JOANNE G MURPHY
January 13, 2004 at 3:51 pm
37[i’m just a gurl with no url!]
I think that, since there were insufficient minorities in Vermont to politically correctify Dean’s cabinet, he should have done the honorable thing and imported some from New Jersey!
Susie
January 13, 2004 at 5:17 pm
38Thought #1:
Never feed the trolls
Thought #2:
You stupid trolls! Adam has been to Bennington many many times — to visit me, in fact — and he knows the last time he checked there was no mall. It’s funnier that way, it’s COM-IDDY. Get it?
Thought #3
Trolls never get it. Rinse, repeat.
Susie
January 13, 2004 at 5:28 pm
39Anyway, the line says, “heading to the mall.”
You can head to a mall, even if you’re at the North Pole.
Stupid TrollllARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Sorry.
Hieronymus Braintree
January 13, 2004 at 6:52 pm
40Seriously now, we may want to remember that Al Sharpton was found liable in court for defaming a white police officer by accusing him of raping a black girl in a situation where he knew it wasn’t true or should have known but simply didn’t care. That he did this for eight months and raised New York to a pitch of racial animosity the likes of which I have never seen and which was totally unnecessary. And he did it basically just to call attention to himself. Every time he identifies himself as a Democrat, Republicans smile.
If you think Bill Bennett is obnoxious — and he is — imagine what a justifiably poisonous reaction most Americans have when they think of Al Sharpton. Then consider how it affects the vote in November.
Why do we want this guy? Clearly rejecting this rat bastard would get us far more votes than we would lose. It’s both good politics and the right thing to do. Win, win.
GoldyGopher
January 13, 2004 at 7:05 pm
41Murray,
Go Gophers! Ski-U-Mah!
:)
tess
January 13, 2004 at 8:26 pm
42there’re minorities in vermont? what, are they irish?
i mean, it could be worse — the media attention sharpton’s getting might have actually diverted attention from more important matters of state such as the deficit, iraq and o’neill, plame-gate . . . oh, wait.
-=e=-
January 14, 2004 at 10:48 am
43Damn…
I step away for a day, and the comments get so damn serious. What happened?
elaine
January 14, 2004 at 2:00 pm
44i’m a vermont resident and when i read about al’s question to dean, i knew he had never been to vermont. we have the highest incidence of melanoma in the US simply because we have the highest percentage of caucasians in our population.
the thing about all the other demo candidates attacking dean all the time is that we get to hear more and more about dean and his views/positions and practically nothing about the other candidates views/positions. i’m leaning towards dean as my choice, but it’s only because i feel i have more of a complete picture of him, and hardly anything about the others.
Chris
January 14, 2004 at 3:12 pm
45Good point about Dean, elaine.
I did hear a lot of Clark the other day when some news channel broadcasted a 2-hour radio interview with him. Overall I was impressed. He seemed knowledgable, articulate, and likeable. I’m not sure if that means he really is all those things or if he was just very well-prepped by his staff.
And frankly, I think Gen. Clark is a better ‘face for America,’ than Dean, physically speaking. Sure, appearances are overrated, but Clark looks so robust and youthful! Doesn’t that count for something?
Jen
January 14, 2004 at 11:21 pm
46Please don’t vote for someone based upon how the look. I am begging you. I haven’t heard once in all the debate over who would make a good president what the people will be doing to help change America’s course. We live in the nieghborhoods. We work the jobs. Why aren’t WE doing Anything to Change things? Why do we think One Person…or One party will do it?? I am afraid for the futre really. I am scared to death. I hope we learn to compromise and I hope we learn to give. No politician in this country could ever have a more profound effect on the world…that that of a united citizenry. Peace..
susie
January 15, 2004 at 12:34 am
47maybe we should vote for someone based on how they look… via Gawker, check out some supposed “Howard Dean Porn”
http://www.wage-slave.org/
Ooh he’s a hottie!
Chris
January 15, 2004 at 11:16 am
48That’s hilarious! Seriously though, (and speaking as a male) he looks great for a white-haired guy of, what, 50? Older? I have no idea. Doesn’t it say something about Clark’s self-discipline when he can keep himself in shape like that, while Dean looks like he’s in danger of melting into wispy gray-haired lard?
Jen, I’m not going to base my vote on any of this, but you better believe this stuff affects voters’ impressions of candidates.
John Isbell
January 16, 2004 at 9:50 pm
49Hieronymus, how do you propose we keep Al Sharpton from running? Would you favor a big guy at the door at the debates, or should we do something on the regional level too? We can easily make it clear that we don’t want people like him on our party stages, at the very least.
Perhaps you could mail your thoughts to the DCC, and you should maybe drop a line to Al, it seems polite. You could mention who you DO want running too, to give him some context. Context is useful. Is it his lack of criminal record that bothers you? You’d think we could convict him of something.
kryssy
January 18, 2004 at 1:50 pm
50This would have been the funniest thing I’ve seen all week, except the nearest mall to Bennington is in Albany.
backfist
January 26, 2004 at 5:09 pm
51On a slightly serious note, I (an African American man) have long wondered what it would be like living in Vermont. I know that there are about 100 Blacks who live there, but working in the corporate ranks, I’m used to that.
Any advice for? Against?
Anonymous
February 19, 2004 at 2:33 pm
52Ok people, here goes… There are very very very few black people living in Vermont. Is this Howard Deans’ fault? I personally think more black people should move to Vermont, but they don’t. Is this Howard Deans’ fault? Fact of the matter is, if black people move to Vermont and apply for jobs in State Government, they would get jobs just like us white folks.
I like black people. But the fact remains they do not move to Vermont. Is this Howard’s fault? Maybe a black person could tell me why blacks have not moved to Vermont.
Fact of the matter is more vermonters died in the Civil War than from any other State in the Union. Blacks have always been welcome here in Vermont. Fact of the matter is blacks,jews and my people the Roman Catholics were all harrassed by the KKK, right here in Vermont up to the 1930’s. My people stood tall and fought the good fight and we drove the KKK out of Town.
Don’t get down on Howard Dean rather thank the people of Vermont who’s relatives died to free the blacks. Thank my relatives for standing with the blacks and Jews against the KKK.
Howard Dean is a good man.