WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Officials overseeing an Iraqi fuel contract with Halliburton Co. have sent Pentagon auditors documents the auditors have said will show the company did not overcharge for fuel shipped into Iraq.
From The Houston Chronicle - Halliburton charged the government $2.27 a gallon for importing fuel from Kuwait but only $1.18 a gallon from Turkey… Calling the corps’ actions “incomprehensible,” Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., argued the memo effectively “sabotages” the government’s investigation.
“At the very moment that serious questions are raised by federal auditors about Halliburton, the administration intervenes to excuse Halliburton from its obligation to justify its costs or pricing,” the lawmakers wrote…
________________________________________________
Curious as to how paying double for Kuwaiti fuel is an example of “fair prices,” I called Halliburton. Actually, I’m kinda surprised that nobody else in the media thought to do this, but there you have it. As I am in no way a reporter, I’ll simply supply you with a transcript of the call:
HALLIBURTON P.R. GUY: Hello! Halliburton Public Relations. How can I help you?
ADAM: Hi, this is Adam Felber. Who am I speaking to?
H.P.R.G: This is Halliburton Public Interface Unit #415b. But you can call me “Hal.”
ADAM: Great.. Hal, I was just curious about the whole charging the army $2.27 a gallon for oil from Kuwait thing.
HAL: Oh, yeah, hey. Well, you have to understand that it costs a lot of money to ship oil in that part of the world.
ADAM: But most of our oil comes from there.
HAL: Right. It’s the roads.
ADAM: The roads?
HAL: Iraq’s roads are in terrible shape. Travel takes time, and time is money.
ADAM: But you guys charged half that price for oil from Turkey.
HAL: Did I say Iraq’s roads? I meant Kuwait’s roads. Terrible condition. You’re basically paving it as you go.
ADAM: Then why didn’t you just get all the oil from Turkey?
HAL: Ummm - because their roads are …too skinny?
ADAM: No.
HAL: Okay, forget the road thing. That’s not true at all. What’s true is this: The army needed lots of oil, so we had to get it from both places, and…
ADAM: Yes?
HAL: …and …and …and the proximity of Kuwait to southern Iraq made the oil transport more cost effective.
ADAM: But you charged twice as much.
HAL: Right, I see where you’re going with that.
ADAM: Why didn’t you buy from the Saudis instead, or from anyone who was willing to charge a competitive price? Or, at the very least, threatened to do so as a bargaining tactic.
HAL: Well, Kuwaiti fuel is better.
ADAM: What?
HAL: Yeah, it’s top-quality stuff! Why, you can get, like, four times more per gallon out of Kuwaiti fuel. Easily.
ADAM: No you can’t.
HAL: Right. You’re right. When you’re right, you’re right.
ADAM: So…
HAL: So, the real reason is that the Kuwaiti’s oil is more… secure.
ADAM: How does that work?
HAL: It doesn’t, does it?
ADAM: No.
HAL: Okay, see, the thing is that it was all the Kuwaiti’s fault.
ADAM: Their fault.
HAL: Yep. they stifled competition, only allowed one company to bid, wouldn’t bargain, you know, they were awful.
ADAM: Once again, there’s that idea of getting the oil from elsewhere.
HAL: Ri-i-i-i-ght. Well, we couldn’t.
ADAM: No?
HAL: No. There were time constraints. Like when you really need a pack of smokes and you know the corner deli overcharges but you don’t have time to get in the car and drive down to the place with the good prices. That ever happen to you?
ADAM: Sure.
HAL: That’s what happened to us. Bastards. Twice the Turkish price, can you imagine? Geez.
ADAM: So that’s your explanation?
HAL: Um, yes?
ADAM: Yes?
HAL: Yes. Of course it is. What else could it be?
ADAM: Well, there’s a part of me that suspects that because of Halliburton’s long-standing relationship with the Kuwaitis, they were overly willing to accept outrageous prices because they knew that the US government was ultimately paying for it. Part of me thinks that the whole thing was done with a nudge and a wink and full knowledge that a better deal could have been arranged, and that if Kuwait was indeed gouging you, it would have taken only a single phone call to get the Bush administration to apply sufficient diplomatic pressure that would have saved the American taxpayer millions of dollars.
HAL: Right, well, it’s not like they were gouging, per se.
ADAM: Okay, then, what was it?
HAL: See, it’s the roads -
[*CLICK*]





18 comments
Benedict
January 9, 2004 at 7:19 pm
1Speaking of HAL, I wonder how DARPA’s self-aware computer of the same name is coming along. By now it almost certainly has inserted control chips in the scientists’ heads.
praktike
January 9, 2004 at 7:56 pm
2You funny, funny man.
Dee
January 9, 2004 at 7:58 pm
3Maybe the Kuwaitis gave Green Stamps?
tess
January 9, 2004 at 8:45 pm
4hey, why doesn’t each of us just pump a gallon of gas and fedex it to iraq? it’d probably be cheaper even with the insurance and hazardous chemical handling fees.
Bryan
January 9, 2004 at 8:46 pm
5It wasn’t as if the Kuwaiti company had ties to the family of the Emir…oh, I’m sorry, never mind.
John Isbell
January 10, 2004 at 10:16 am
6Lovely. I see where you’re going with this.
Anonymous
January 10, 2004 at 6:15 pm
7Actually, the fact of the matter is that Halliburton’s contract mandates that it buy the oil from Kuwait and it broke the contract by buying the cheaper oil from Turkey, saving the US millions of dollars. As much as I hate Halliburton and think that their contract is a giveaway from Chaney, in this case they are not in the wrong. The defense dept needs to have its feet held to the fire for demanding high priced Kuwaiti oil. That is the scandal. There is even a political component that involves one of the Democratic presidential candidates that will probably come out soon.
For all of the stupid and evil things that this company is guilty of, this is not one.
How do I know?
My wife works for the Defense Contract Auditing Agency and even though this is not her audit, she is familiar with it.
Because we are paranoid about retaliation (there is someone who reads her email and deletes anything that is even remotely anti- administration) I will remain anonymous
Ras_Nesta
January 11, 2004 at 3:27 am
8Yeah, sure, anon.[/sarcasm]
Why doesn’t Cheneyburton bring this up in their defense?
Does their plum no-bid contract specify a principle of “no self-defense”?
Pat R.
January 11, 2004 at 10:25 am
9My god, that anonymous ‘fact of the matter’ comment is hilarious. To whoever dropped that in here: please, give us more.
BTW, Adam, way to kick ass on WWDTM yesterday.
jerry
January 11, 2004 at 11:43 am
10Halliburton has raised this as their defense. Halliburton had to buy the oil from from only approved sources. They are not allowed to shop arround. There was only one supplier from Kuwait approved.
It just hasn’t been reported very well.
I’l see if I can find the article again later this morning.
sly
January 11, 2004 at 2:21 pm
11So, it’s the government’s fault that the only company allowed to supply oil charged inflated prices to the government? I like it.
I hear Homer Simpson’s voice saying “In a way, Marge, this is all YOUR fault.”
jerry
January 11, 2004 at 2:59 pm
12I found the article. It’s from teh 12/31 edition of the Dallas Morning News. (I’ve never been able to get the html tags right, sorry)
http://www.dallasnews.com/dmn/news/stories/123103dnbizhalliburton.f4cb 4748.html
selected excerpts:
“The gasoline distribution contract has been criticized by Democratic lawmakers and questioned by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, which is evaluating whether the Pentagon was overcharged by $61 million. Halliburton, a Houston-based oilfield services company, has denied wrongdoing, and the Pentagon comptroller said two weeks ago that there is no evidence the company intentionally inflated prices.”
“The Army Corps of Engineers asked the Defense Energy Support Center to review taking over the petroleum import and distribution mission “not because we think KBR is overcharging the government, but because what was supposed to have been a short-term mission is now expected to last through the winter months,” said Bob Faletti, a corps spokesman.”
“Halliburton has said it expected to be cleared by the Defense Department. The company said its pricing resulted from a contract with a Kuwaiti firm, the only company approved as a supplier by the corps.”
Basically, KBR has the contract to do the stop-gap supplying of fuel. Now that the fuel supply contract is to be long-term, it is being administered by the same entity that negotiates all along-term fuel contracts for the US military.
People who have ideological differences with he President and his administration have many things to be upset about. The Kellog, Brown and Root contracts really aren’t some of those issues. KBR has been a vendor of the DOD since Vietnam. They saw huge growth under the Clinton administration due to downsizing and outsourcing. They get high marks in general from the DOD in their ability to fulfill their contracts efficiently. The number of companies that do what they do is in the single digits. So if you have a company with a good track record and with which you have a 30+ year relationship and you need to issue contracts fast - KBR is it.
jerry (a different jerry)
January 11, 2004 at 3:47 pm
13Perhaps Jerry, the scandal then is why did the contracts have be issued fast? Facts are clear that the Administration had at least a year (perhaps two years) to prepare those contracts.
jerry
January 11, 2004 at 8:21 pm
14True. I concede that the following questions would be open to legitimate debate and investigation:
Why did we need to have “no bid” contracts and
why did we refuse to appoint an Inspector General to oversee the implementation of those contracts?
I will not concede that there are not legitimate answers to those questions.
Pat R.
January 12, 2004 at 8:55 am
15“Legitimate” or not, it remains hilarious that these are the answers being tendered for something so absurd. Whatever else one might say about the current unelected administration, they are a seemingly endless source of superb comedy.
Anonymous
January 12, 2004 at 10:50 am
16The system is broken. A no bid contract from a company that is still paying Chaney is outrageous. The Procurement Agency mandating a single, high priced, provider is crazy. The Bush administration planed this war from its first days in office, there was plenty of time to plan properly.
There are so many problems that need to be addressed, but on this one issue Halliburton is the wrong enemy.
harry
January 18, 2004 at 11:58 am
17Sly,
“So, it’s the government’s fault that the only company allowed to supply oil charged inflated prices to the government? I like it.”
You like the government pushing tax dollars into private pockets?
I just feel like a slave, paying bloody tax money and look how I have no possibility not to sponsor psychopat millionaires laughing at me (”we do nothing wrong…”)
Steve
March 25, 2004 at 2:59 pm
18Does anyone know the name of the Kuwaiti company?