Comments on: Incurious George Meets Spurious Joe http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/ America's favorite blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:49:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Redshift http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3265 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3265 Yeah, I heard it on the radio, and it's even worse in his voice. I don't often yell at the little people in the radio, but this was one time I couldn't contain myself. If Lieberman wants to maintain the illusion that he doesn't want Bush re-elected, he might want to avoid reading <i>directly</i> from the RNC talking points for the week. Though it may cut down on your source material, Adam, I can't wait until we get past Iowa and New Hampshire so no one will pay attention to him any more. Yeah, I heard it on the radio, and it’s even worse in his voice. I don’t often yell at the little people in the radio, but this was one time I couldn’t contain myself. If Lieberman wants to maintain the illusion that he doesn’t want Bush re-elected, he might want to avoid reading directly from the RNC talking points for the week. Though it may cut down on your source material, Adam, I can’t wait until we get past Iowa and New Hampshire so no one will pay attention to him any more.

]]> by: Mike O'Connell http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3266 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3266 Excellent point Adam. Unfortunately I'm afraid that that logic is about eight levels deeper than anybody voting for Bush will ever understand. Excellent point Adam.
Unfortunately I’m afraid that that logic is about eight levels deeper than anybody voting for Bush will ever understand.

]]> by: Phishtar http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3267 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3267 Seacrest? The horror! I must withdraw all support for Edwards right away... Oh, wait, I stopped watching American Idol. Carry on. Seacrest? The horror! I must withdraw all support for Edwards right away…

Oh, wait, I stopped watching American Idol.

Carry on.

]]> by: Marla http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3268 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3268 Thank you! Thank you!

]]> by: michael (in DC) http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3269 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3269 If Adam Felber had his way, millions of American Children would not believe in Santa Claus! the children. think of the children! m If Adam Felber had his way, millions of American Children would not believe in Santa Claus!

the children. think of the children!

m

]]> by: Bryan http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3270 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3270 Adam, you do realize that your statement on WWDTM makes you pretty much unelectable. I'm sorry, there's no way to spin yourself out of it. You can get away with a advocating a few regional wars, but there are limits. Sadly, Joe has a better chance than you do. Of course, he is about the only Connecticut politician not in the market for a defense attorney. Adam, you do realize that your statement on WWDTM makes you pretty much unelectable.

I’m sorry, there’s no way to spin yourself out of it. You can get away with a advocating a few regional wars, but there are limits.

Sadly, Joe has a better chance than you do. Of course, he is about the only Connecticut politician not in the market for a defense attorney.

]]> by: Murray http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3271 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3271 When I heard Lieberman say "Sadam would still be in power today, not in prison" My first thought was that Dean should say. "That's probably true, but instead, Osama would be in prison". When I heard Lieberman say “Sadam would still be in power today, not in prison” My first thought was that Dean should say. “That’s probably true, but instead, Osama would be in prison”.

]]> by: james http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3272 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3272 YOU DA MAN! YOU DA MAN!

]]> by: tess http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3273 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3273 it's statements like these that make me want to vote for sharpton. at least he acts like a democrat instead of a wimpy republican. it’s statements like these that make me want to vote for sharpton. at least he acts like a democrat instead of a wimpy republican.

]]> by: Michael (in LA) http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3274 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/12/15/incurious-george-meets-spurious-joe/#comment-3274 You could also add the time-honored preceding clause "the British Government had learned that.." at the beginning, if deniability is of the utmost necessity... You could also add the time-honored preceding clause “the British Government had learned that..” at the beginning, if deniability is of the utmost necessity…

]]>