<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100% UV Protection in Iraq</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2732</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2732</guid>
					<description>It must just be one of those unbelievable coincidences, Cheneys' working for Halliburton, and their getting a no bid contract to rebuild Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must just be one of those unbelievable coincidences, Cheneys&#8217; working for Halliburton, and their getting a no bid contract to rebuild Iraq.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2733</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2733</guid>
					<description>Do you believe in ... miracles??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you believe in &#8230; miracles??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dee, the Tall Brazilian Woman</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2734</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2734</guid>
					<description>That was YOU?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was YOU?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dugrless</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2735</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2735</guid>
					<description>Actually, I don't think your loyalty to Sunglass Hut makes a good comparison to Cheney's with Halliburton.  It would be, perhaps, if the guys &#038; gals who worked retail shifts with you were now board members, owners and the largest beneficiaries of Sunglass Hut.  Then, there might be a similar issue.

Cheney may be entirely right in saying he doesn't give a whit about or get a dime from Halliburton... the problem is that the ones who do give whits and get dimes are guys who can now get their pal Dick on the phone.  The loyalty is to the top-level execs / old buddies / campaign contributors at Halliburton, and that kind of loyalty is a LOT harder to prove and trace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think your loyalty to Sunglass Hut makes a good comparison to Cheney&#8217;s with Halliburton.  It would be, perhaps, if the guys &#038; gals who worked retail shifts with you were now board members, owners and the largest beneficiaries of Sunglass Hut.  Then, there might be a similar issue.</p>
<p>Cheney may be entirely right in saying he doesn&#8217;t give a whit about or get a dime from Halliburton&#8230; the problem is that the ones who do give whits and get dimes are guys who can now get their pal Dick on the phone.  The loyalty is to the top-level execs / old buddies / campaign contributors at Halliburton, and that kind of loyalty is a LOT harder to prove and trace.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chicory</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2736</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2736</guid>
					<description>If it looks like bribe, sounds like a bribe......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it looks like bribe, sounds like a bribe&#8230;&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: julia</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2737</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2737</guid>
					<description>Is this not counting the enormous pension that he hadn't worked for the company long enough to vest for which the board voted to give him anyway when he left? Has he dealt with those messy tens of millions in stock options yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this not counting the enormous pension that he hadn&#8217;t worked for the company long enough to vest for which the board voted to give him anyway when he left? Has he dealt with those messy tens of millions in stock options yet?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tess</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2738</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2738</guid>
					<description>hmm, why do i suddenly think of sides of beef whenever anyone mentions dick cheney?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, why do i suddenly think of sides of beef whenever anyone mentions dick cheney?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2739</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2739</guid>
					<description>Good post. I'm surprised that more people haven't called Cheney on the logic of his "I have no financial interest, so there's nothing wrong" claim. Most people have graviated towards attacking the first part of his claim, "I hav eno financial interest in Haliburton", which plays in Cheney's hands because it's much easier for him to defend that statement than the more relevant assertion that there's no favoritism for other reasons at play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I&#8217;m surprised that more people haven&#8217;t called Cheney on the logic of his &#8220;I have no financial interest, so there&#8217;s nothing wrong&#8221; claim. Most people have graviated towards attacking the first part of his claim, &#8220;I hav eno financial interest in Haliburton&#8221;, which plays in Cheney&#8217;s hands because it&#8217;s much easier for him to defend that statement than the more relevant assertion that there&#8217;s no favoritism for other reasons at play.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: xian</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2740</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/10/26/100-uv-protection-in-iraq/#comment-2740</guid>
					<description>Cheney only lies when he talks out of the left side of his mouth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney only lies when he talks out of the left side of his mouth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
