Ten years ago, I moved to New York in order to seek out fame and fortune as an actor/writer. Oddly, there was no Writers’ Welcoming Committee on the Triboro Bridge. The newspapers were utterly devoid of job opportunities for “Stars of Tomorrow.” I hung around various strategically-placed diners for a week without seeing a single leading man slip in a gravy spill, break his leg, and have his harried producer rush in, look at me and say, “Hey, kid, can you sing? Curtain goes up at the Biltmore in ten minutes!” This was disappointing.
I took a job at the Sunglass Hut at the South Street Seaport. Stick with me, I’m going somewhere with this.
As day jobs go, the Sunglass Hut wasn’t bad at all. I was a pretty good salesman, I made decent commissions, the management was kind and supportive, and packs of tall Brazilian women would frequently saunter in, buy hundreds of dollars worth of designer sunglasses from me, and invite me to stay with them when I came to Brazil, frequently while their husbands looked on or nodded encouragingly. It was a good job.
I soon became an Assistant Manager, but I turned down opportunities to advance further - I needed to keep some time free to write scripts and audition. So A.M. is as far as I ever went before (tiny) fame and (pitifully small) fortune in show business allowed me to quit after a little over a year. I left with a month’s rent, fond memories, some new friends, and several scraps of paper with the addresses of estates outside Sao Paulo.
Now, several years later, I still occasionally buy sunglasses and related paraphernalia at Sunglass Hut. When the opportunity comes up, I’ll recommend the store to friends. It’s not like I have stock in the company, I just have some lingering affection for the place. Call it “residual loyalty.”
So if I ever rise to a post of great political power and I’m put in the position of being able to do a favor for Sunglass Hut as opposed to some rival company, I’d have to confess that I’d be a bit biased. I’d have to be on guard against it in my decision-making process. I’d have to ask myself, “Do I REALLY believe the ozone layer’s not all that important? Or do I just want to flood the planet with UV rays in order to open up the valuable deer and cattle eye-protection market for for those who sell Ray Bans?”
It’d be a concern. Probably more so if I’d run the Sunglass Hut corporation, earned millions of dollars from it, still received an annual check for $150,000, and had only left the place a couple of years ago.
So when Dick Cheney says, “I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven’t had, now, for over three years,” he’s missing the point. Or rather, he’s hoping we miss the point. Either there is some bias (that he’s denying) towards foreign and domestic policies that help out the company he ran until 2000, or the guy’s got less loyalty, sentiment, and dedication than a 20-something retail drone looking to move on.
Neither possibility is all that attractive.
But when America finally wises up and Cheney and the rest of Bush Oil are sent to spend their sunset years down in Texas, I’ll be happy to help Dick find a stylish pair of shades that’ll protect his eyes and de-accentuate those overfed jowls. And I just might be able to recommend a good place to buy ‘em.





9 comments
Murray
October 26, 2003 at 5:40 pm
1It must just be one of those unbelievable coincidences, Cheneys’ working for Halliburton, and their getting a no bid contract to rebuild Iraq.
Don
October 26, 2003 at 6:53 pm
2Do you believe in … miracles??
Dee, the Tall Brazilian Woman
October 26, 2003 at 10:21 pm
3That was YOU?
Dugrless
October 26, 2003 at 10:50 pm
4Actually, I don’t think your loyalty to Sunglass Hut makes a good comparison to Cheney’s with Halliburton. It would be, perhaps, if the guys & gals who worked retail shifts with you were now board members, owners and the largest beneficiaries of Sunglass Hut. Then, there might be a similar issue.
Cheney may be entirely right in saying he doesn’t give a whit about or get a dime from Halliburton… the problem is that the ones who do give whits and get dimes are guys who can now get their pal Dick on the phone. The loyalty is to the top-level execs / old buddies / campaign contributors at Halliburton, and that kind of loyalty is a LOT harder to prove and trace.
Chicory
October 27, 2003 at 12:42 pm
5If it looks like bribe, sounds like a bribe……
julia
October 27, 2003 at 2:10 pm
6Is this not counting the enormous pension that he hadn’t worked for the company long enough to vest for which the board voted to give him anyway when he left? Has he dealt with those messy tens of millions in stock options yet?
tess
October 27, 2003 at 2:42 pm
7hmm, why do i suddenly think of sides of beef whenever anyone mentions dick cheney?
Jason
October 27, 2003 at 3:24 pm
8Good post. I’m surprised that more people haven’t called Cheney on the logic of his “I have no financial interest, so there’s nothing wrong” claim. Most people have graviated towards attacking the first part of his claim, “I hav eno financial interest in Haliburton”, which plays in Cheney’s hands because it’s much easier for him to defend that statement than the more relevant assertion that there’s no favoritism for other reasons at play.
xian
October 27, 2003 at 8:43 pm
9Cheney only lies when he talks out of the left side of his mouth.