A personal anecdote:
In the mid-to-late 90’s, I was in chronic pain. I had a weak lower back that always ached, often to the point where I was laid up in bed for days at a time. There was little mystery to my condition - I’m relatively certain that it had something to do with my insistence on performing ill-advised feats of physical comedy. Sometimes these involved lifting people above my head. Sometimes I did this early in the morning, in public schools. Sometimes without stretching beforehand. In short, I was doing Dumb Things, and when those Dumb Things led to injury, I attacked the problem by… doing ‘em again.
By ‘97, my crafty strategy of “tough love” for my spine backfired, and I blew out two disks, one of which fragmented and began pressing on my spinal nerve. By the time I finally got around to the necessary surgery, I was in constant pain and had lost about 60% of the muscle mass in my frighteningly atrophying right leg. Several months of rehab followed.
You see where I’m going with this. I feel Rush Limbaugh’s pain.
I was prescribed some pretty amazing painkillers during that time, though I was loathe to use them - I wanted to know exactly how much pain I was in. Otherwise, how can you be sure you’re doing enough complaining? You may be missing out on opportunities to writhe and moan and have your loved ones bring you things, and to me that’s simply unacceptable. So I never developed a dependency.
I don’t fault Rush for becoming a drug addict, though. Pain sucks.
What I do fault Rush for is this: When you have a serious back condition and adequate medical care, it’s not too tough to get ahold of copious quantities of the good stuff. The really good stuff. Without even asking, I was offered quantities of topnotch drugs that would allow me to perform open heart surgery on myself without undue discomfort. One memorable evening I took a hot bath that I didn’t realize was burning my body until I looked at my skin afterwards. That’s how strong these drugs can be - you can comfortably make a nice soup with yourself as the stock.
My reasoning facilities remained in pretty good shape though. I was able to say things like “Hmmm. I just cooked myself. How odd.”
So if the media reports are to be believed, at some point Rush decided that his legally-obtained ultra-opiates simply weren’t enough, and he opted to start making drug deals and self-prescribing. Knowingly. That’s a big step. There’s no way to do that without being aware that you’re going behind your doctors’ backs and breaking the law. It doesn’t make Rush a Tony Montana. But it does make him a knowing criminal.
And, to me, a bit of a wuss.





21 comments
Dee
October 11, 2003 at 6:37 pm
1And, to me, a bit of a hypocrite.
Rush has often condemned drug addicts, talked about how they should all be locked up instead of being “coddled” with treatment. I’m happy for him that he has enough money to check himself into a rehap facility for a month; too bad there are thousands of folks who can’t afford that same luxury.
By the way, I’ve just spent the last four hours raking and dethatching my lawn by hand and since I am Not As Young As I Used To Be I would KILL for some Oxycontin… Morphine… Heroin… Adam–you got any leftovers?
Evan
October 11, 2003 at 8:28 pm
2I completely agree. I have great sympathy for addicts, but the guy was buying mass quantities of street drugs and still calling for bad, evil, not-rich addicts to be put in jail. What an asshole.
BTW, Dee, if you want to ask for oxycontin, you should now use the official street name for the drug: “dittoes”.
sharoney
October 12, 2003 at 1:48 am
3” …but the guy was buying mass quantities of street drugs and still calling for bad, evil, not-rich addicts to be put in jail.”
He’s not only ‘addicted to painkillers’ (which is the current euphemism for JUNKIE). He’s not just a lying hypocrite. He’s an abusive bully.
When his housekeeper began to show understandable reluctance at being forced into the role of supplier he THREATENED her. She became frightened enough to go to the police to protect herself–despite the fact that he was a bigshot rich white celebrity and she was a non-white service-industry employee and had good reason to believe the cops would take his word over hers.
She’s the brave one, not him. He’s not sorry he became an addict. He’s just very, very sorry he got caught.
But it makes no difference. As has been said elsewhere in the blogosphere, to his rabid followers he’s now officially damaged goods. He’ll never have the credibility he may have had before. And that may be the most appropriate punishment for him.
Karma’s a bitch.
Steve G.
October 12, 2003 at 4:37 am
4When determining how judgemental and moralizing I should be toward others, I always ask myself, “What Would Rush Do?”
Sep. 23, 1993: “If there’s a line of cocaine here, I have to make the choice to go down and sniff it […] If there were a gun here, it couldn’t fire itself. I’ve got to reach for it and pull the trigger […] we are rationalizing all this irresponsibility and all the choices people are making and we’re blaming not them, but society for it. All these Hollywood celebrities say […] .”
Dec. 16, 1994: “So we’re not going to get on–we don’t fault these animals for a lack of discipline, but we get on human beings who are fat for lack of discipline and you know it and I know it. But here’s the thing that struck me about this. We have alcoholics and drug addicts in our society, don’t we? And what do we say about them? Well, they can’t help it. Why, it’s genetic. Why, they have a disease. Why, put one thimbleful of scotch in front of them and they can die.’ We totally exempt them from any control over their lives, do we not? Some athlete will spend two years snorting lines of coke. ‘He can’t help it.’ You know, it’s–it’s just–it’s not–it’s–it’s genetic. These people–they’re predisposed to having this addictive syndrome. They–they can’t help–yeah, like that line of cocaine just happened to march into the hotel, go up to the athlete’s room and put itself right there in front of him on his blotter.”
Oct. 5, 1995: “What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting [black] people out of jail because we’re not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.”
Oct. 15, 1995: “Another Democrat–another–folks, these people are taking it really hard, you know, these Democrats […] getting drunk. Here–a guy who had been cited, who had been recognized for his great work in alcohol and drug abuse is drunk on the highways. This is just–it’s tragic, but it’s just–it’s outrageously funny. And he is just the latest in a series of Democratic legislators in Minnesota accused of crimes including shoplifting, spouse abuse and insurance fraud. Conflict resolution, Democrats and all their good social works, and still, look at what ha–it just–it’s–it’s hypocrisy. …
[Hm.]
Jan. 15, 1996: “… There were a couple of drug convictions out in–I think it was a Colorado court. And these guys had–had done some really bad stuff, and there were mandated federal sentences for the crimes they had committed. And the judge apologized to the criminals while sentencing them because he thought it was too severe. He apologized and the community was outraged. So we’ve gone from a judge sentencing a mother who makes her child beg six months in jail, to judges apologizing for getting dope dealers and crack dealers and drug salesmen off the streets with too severe a sentence.”
Oct. 21, 2002: All she [Maureen Dowd]’s got now is bourbon for mouthwash, and it’s showing on her columns.”
Aug. 18, 2003: “Mandatory minimums are totally constitutional. And these tough sentencing laws were instituted for a reason. The American people, including liberals, demanded them. Don’t you remember the crack cocaine epidemic? Crack babies and out-of-control murder rates? Liberal judges giving the bad guys slaps on the wrist? Finally we got tough, and the crime rate has been falling ever since, so what’s wrong?”
[Limbaugh faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years in jail if it can be proven he was in possession of 28 grams or more of OxyContin. That’s just 175 of his “little blues,” or 160 mg blue OxyContin pills.]
Sep. 23, 2003: “To Ted Kennedy, whose liver is said to be shaped like a Chivas Regal bottle, what Bush said and what’s best for America and the Iraqis doesn’t matter.”
(Date unknown): “When you strip it all away, Jerry Garcia destroyed his life on drugs. And yet he’s being honored, like some godlike figure. Our priorities are out of whack, folks.”
[Attention, Marconi people.]
aaron
October 12, 2003 at 9:50 am
5As with most of Adam’s readers, there have been very few opportunities to ridicule, belittle, or discredit Mr. Limbaugh that I personally have not jumped on like Arnold on a pretty caterer. This one’s different, though.
I cannot blame Mr. Limbaugh in any way, shape or form for his addiction to painkillers. The pain he has to endure every day must be immense. He not only has to listen to Rush Limbaugh all day, he has to BE Rush Limbaugh all day. Hell, I would have shot myself years ago.
The selfless act of assuming this obscene and absurd persona 24-7 must take an incredible amount of mental (and physical…especially in his more obese days) srtength, and I would imagine that it would be next to impossible without the aid of some serious medicinal intervention.
You go, Rush. Now tell ‘em about the coke.
leftbanker
October 12, 2003 at 3:49 pm
6Like most bipeds, I have had my share of debilitating back pain. I said no to pain killers and concentrated on physical therapy. Unlike Rush, I would say my response to this condition is role-model worthy (I only use drugs for recreation). I also don’t think Rush would have come clean had he not been under CRIMINAL investigation. I’m sure he has also opposed medical marijuana usage–a non-addictive pain reliever. He made his bed of hypocrital rhetoric, let him lie in it.
Bob
October 12, 2003 at 4:19 pm
7Believe me, Rush isn’t damaged goods to his followers. If hypocrisy were all it took to kill his career, he would have made the transition to the fast-food industry years ago. Even a felony conviction won’t do it: ask G. Gordon Liddy.
Then again, if Rush weren’t a shill for the Republicans, he’d get the chair.
Not that I’m bitter about any of this…
Murray
October 12, 2003 at 6:49 pm
8As a confirmed bleeding heart, I have sympathy for those with problems. Yet, as a former Calvinist I believe in personal responsibility. But what I can’t stand are the hypocrites who demand mercy for themselves and harsh justice for everyone else.
When Clinton was being inpeached for having sex with an intern, guess what his accusers were doing (Newt, Hyde, Livingston).
Bush claimed that Gore wasn’t moral enough to be president so instead we get the first president to come with his own arrest record, (which of course he lied about).
Drugs? the right wing believes in prompt, gental treatment as many times as is necessary until the poor person is free of adiction. Well,… as long as that person is the daughter of the governor of Florida. Other than that, may you rot in jail and then in Hell.
Who has been preaching to America about morals day and night for years? good old, “come-on-baby-needs-a-new-pair-of-shoes” Bill Bennett.
Unfortunalely as long as the average American can’t think his way out of a wet paper bag none of this will register. He’ll just accept the next lie from the republicans and it will start all over again.
As Garrison said yesterday,
“We now know that Rush has been taking massive amounts of pain killers, which would explain how he was able to listen to himself all of those years.
val
October 12, 2003 at 9:03 pm
9I want to hear more from Rush about his horrible battle with hearing loss. Though he kept it secret for some time, when it finally came out the syympathy was overwhelming.
OF COURSE the reason he kept it quiet (no pun intended) was his incredible bravery in the face of diversity.
Or, I suppose, it could have something to do with long-term addiction to pain killers causing substantial hearing loss…
I don’t know, could be either one.
Steve G.
October 12, 2003 at 10:28 pm
10And who can’t help but admire how Rush managed to lose so much weight? All that willpower*!
*and/or drug abuse.
Kevin
October 13, 2003 at 12:35 am
11“…bravery in the face of diversity.” Best Limbaugh joke I’ve heard in years.
jon
October 13, 2003 at 2:52 am
12yeah, I hated them too. I was loath to use them.
Mustang Bobby
October 13, 2003 at 10:29 am
13When I had ankle surgery, they put me on Percodan or some such painkiller, and while it helped with the pain, it also made me constipated. When I asked the pharmacist why this was, he told me that all opiates have this effect. Once I went to regular analgesics, like aspirin, all systems were go.
So it’s literally true: Rush Limbaugh is full of shit.
Chicory
October 13, 2003 at 11:19 am
14Thank you all. I was visiting family when this broke and couldn’t believe the support for Rush I was hearing.
But you got to give the man creidt. He is checking himself into a rehap clinic and, upon release, will roll over on all of his suppliers. Nice to know he is aiding in the war against drugs. (Is there an emoticon for rolling one’s eyes or dripping with sarcasm?)
tim
October 13, 2003 at 1:44 pm
15“Is there an emoticon for rolling one’s eyes or dripping with sarcasm?”
How about:
(°)(°)
If you want to replicate it, Alt-248 is the degree symbol.
John Isbell
October 13, 2003 at 3:24 pm
16Rush is a cockaroach.
This is wonderful: “I was prescribed some pretty amazing painkillers during that time, though I was loathe to use them - I wanted to know exactly how much pain I was in. Otherwise, how can you be sure you’re doing enough complaining?”
Roger Ailes riffed on the Floyd song for Rush too, but you have the title.
“his incredible bravery in the face of diversity.”
Yeah, brilliant.
If you get the Rush “I’m a junkie” announcecement, it’s worth taking mute off the TV, you’ll hear the awe-inspiring self-pity in his voice. I don’t think I’ve ever heard it better conveyed. He sounds like he needs a big hug from a liberal, or maybe a Marine. And some Cheesy Puffs.
peptide
October 13, 2003 at 4:29 pm
17There’s some doubt that he had back pain after all: “Rush Limbaugh Claimed He Had No Physical Limitations When Playing Golf, Even Though He Says Lower Back Pain Was the Cause of His Becoming a Junky on Illegal Drugs” http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/10/con03009.html
Murray
October 13, 2003 at 6:06 pm
18I think that I have it figured out.
Laws are in place only because there are so many godless democrats.
The republicans, who are God’s chosen people, don’t need the laws. Even though they are guilty at least as often as democrats, being God’s chosen they are automatically forgiven, and who can demand justice if God himself has cleared the offender.
Laws are required to punish and remove godless democrats. By definition, being godless, God can’t forgive them, and hence they deserve the harshest punishment.
Now it all makes sense.
John Isbell
October 14, 2003 at 3:13 pm
19Murray (may I call you Bill), that’s pretty close to Janklow’s defense of his multiple speeding tickets before he killed the guy. Can’t he just pay someone some money?
Murray
October 14, 2003 at 7:41 pm
20John (may I call you John?) Yes Janklow is just one more republican who does not need to be held to account for his crimes. Hell, he only killed a guy while speeding for crying out loud it’s not as if he was having sex with an underling. Oh wait a sec… that’s OK, too I guess, if you’re Newt.
(Why would you want to call me Bill?)
John Isbell
October 15, 2003 at 6:22 pm
21Sure, call me John.
You just witnessed my lame Bill Murray joke. BTW his new movie is really good.