Condoleezza Rice says she knows nothing about those leaks that dangerously exposed an undercover CIA agent as retribution for a spouse’s statements. Those darn White House underlings! Always making unauthorized calls to the press, inserting lies into the State of the Union speech, organizing oxford shirt riots at the election centers… those scamps are incorrgible! Uncontrollable.
Actually, when you consider that “two top White House officials called at least six Washington journalists and revealed the identity and occupation of Wilson’s wife,” that’s not exactly a “leak.” That’s a firehose. And at some point blaming the underlings becomes as implausible and creepy as a sex offender trying to pin the blame on his genitals.
The imps responsible are well-protected; Bush has “no plans to ask staff members whether they were involved in revealing the name of Wilson’s wife.” Say what you will about him, that guy has got to be the bestest boss in the whole world. If I worked for him, I’d get him a coffee mug that said so. Whenever I publicly embarrass my superiors on the global stage and endanger the lives and livelihoods of covert operatives, I hear about it. It’s like I perform one measly act of deliberate sabotage with worldwide consequences and suddenly I’m some kind of criminal. I need a boss like Bush, a man who knows that nothing is gained by punishing youthful high spirits.
So the official version runs like this: Some staffer inserts the yellowcake sentence into the State of the Union address. When the claim is refuted by the man who actually investigated it, that man’s wife is exposed to a hostile world as a CIA operative. And it’s all done by anonymous bean-counters, with the President and his top brass completely out of the loop. So what, says the White House, you wanna make a federal case out of it?
Sure, this sort of thing didn’t happen in the 90’s, when the White House help kept their mouths shut unless, of course, they were performing oral sex. But that’s a crime heinous enough to bring on impeachment, not a youthful indiscretion that only affects a few million people, helps start a war, and violates national security. Let’s keep our priorities straight before we all go flying off the handle and start writing big headlines and appointing independent counsels and whatnot. There may have been a few indiscretions here, but it doesn’t rise to the level of erection.





8 comments
MeanTim
September 29, 2003 at 1:31 pm
1that just ruined my day…
tess
September 29, 2003 at 2:21 pm
2i think i’m going to home and start crying. i have a feeling that bush is going to get re-elected next year and that we’re never going to get rid of him.
i want to move to new zealand now. anyone wanna join me?
tim
September 29, 2003 at 2:40 pm
3Excerpt from the transcipt of the D.O.J. deposition of Karl Rove:
ASHCROFT: So, Karl, not that you did it or anything, heaven forbid, I’m certainly not saying that, but you know, for the record, did you leak that guy’s wife’s name?
ROVE: Do the words “Saturday Night Massacre” mean anything to you, Johnny? Bork is still alive, you know. We can have him sitting in your chair within 24 hours.
ASHCROFT: Um…uh..OK! I think we can all agree that the deponent has answered with a big fat “NO!” I think our work is done here. Can I buy you dinner, Karl?
Murray
September 29, 2003 at 6:38 pm
4Well it’s a good thing we have strong willed independant minded, God fearing, upright men and women in congress who won’t stand for, lies, intidation and treason. Why only 5 years ago these same moral individuals took the couragous step of making a president come clean on having sex.
How many republicans believe in country above party? How many will demand an inquiry into an act that has direct implications on national security, and is an actual felony?
Tess, moving to New Zealand sounds good, send a photo.
Retch
September 29, 2003 at 8:31 pm
5mmmm, New Zealand. Sounds like a fine idea.
Don
September 29, 2003 at 11:12 pm
6Bush get re-elected next year?
Of course! Now that votes don’t matter to the nine black robes who found out they can make the call.
John Isbell
September 30, 2003 at 9:48 pm
7Great post, with one of the best analogies to genitals I’ve heard, which when you think about it is saying something.
Folks, scuttlebutt says the CIA is very angry about this. And they fight dirty.
Bruce
October 2, 2003 at 9:22 am
8Tess, my wife and I joke about moving to New Zealand all the time! So, yes, let’s get goin.
And unless we get the computerized voting thing sorted out, Bush will “win” again. Unfortunately, that will probably take a lot of public involvement/agitation. :>(