From Reuters: “Bush Backs Air Force Plan to Lease Boeing Aircraft”
President Bush backed a controversial Air Force plan to lease Boeing Co. 767 aircraft as refueling tankers despite criticism from Congress, according to an interview published on Wednesday…
It also asked Rumsfeld to justify the decision to pay $10.3 million more per aircraft than the $120.7 million price deemed reasonable by the Institute for Defense Analyzes.
The Air Force acknowledges that leasing would cost more than an outright purchase, but argues the extra expense is justified to get the tankers sooner without the up-front investment that would gut other programs.
“In terms of the Boeing worker, Boeing is going through a difficult period,” [Bush] said. “We’re obviously working with Boeing on the construction of … airplanes, which should help the worker, help the economy.”
________________________________________________
Excerpt From President Bush’s Remarks - 9/17/03
PRESIDENT: …now, as a student of history, I remember that back in the 80’s there was a lot of criticism over what the Pentagon was paying for certain stuff. “Five hundred dollars for a hammer,” people were saying. “A thousand for a toilet seat. What’s up with that? Where’s the beef?” [laughs] I always liked that last part. Old lady wanted beef.
But that’s not the point. Point is, a lot of folks were highly criticable of what the government was paying for that stuff. They made fun of President Reagan about it, and when you consider that President Reagan is unable to defend himself nowadays, that seems a little cruel. I’ll never use those shameful tactics.
Looking back, though, we can see what the cynics just didn’t get at the time - the money for those hammers and toilet seats wasn’t going into the hands of Big Government, it was going into the hands of honest, hard-working Americans. Maybe we paid too much. Maybe we cared too much about American workers. I guess I’ll have to accept that accussertion. Of caring. Too much. [pause for laughter]
There’s a man who works at Boeing named John Johnson. Family man, five kids, loyal American. He wrote me a letter the other day, saying, “Thank you President Bush, for protecting our nation, thank you for the big tax cut, thank you. And please, Mr. President, please show the world that America is willing to pay top-dollar for a leasing agreement that will help feed my family.”
A good man. To John Thomson and all the other hard-working American workers who work to make America great, I say “Yes.” Yes, we’ll take those planes. And those hammers. And those toilet seats. Because - and maybe I’m alone in this - I believe that the American government should buy American. Whether you’re in the energy industry or the defense industry or the… or in… other industries, you can count on your government to buy American. We’re willing to pay top dollar for top-quality American goods made by American workers in America.
Maybe some folks in Congress would rather we bought discount French aircraft or something. Not me. Not me. Because when Boeing’s stock price soars like one of their proud American planes, we all win, and our government should be willing to pay for it. And we will. I tell you to today that we will pay for it.
Thank you, and may God continue to bless American.





8 comments
Landis
September 17, 2003 at 3:33 pm
1We certainly will pay for it, all of it.
Are you sure you’re not actually moonlighting for the White House Communications Office?
Mr_Grant
September 17, 2003 at 5:23 pm
2John Johnson WOULD think it’s a good deal. I know John Johnson. He’s in the 2nd year of a 5-year lease on a 2002 Land Rover Discovery, under which he’ll eventually pay 15% more than the MSRP.
Linkmeister
September 17, 2003 at 5:27 pm
3“…may God continue to bless American.”
Um, don’t you mean, “lease American?”
Anonymous
September 17, 2003 at 6:45 pm
4Hey, as long as millions of tax dollars go to uberwealthy Americans why should we worry. The president says it’s good for all of us, and even though I can’t understand it, I’m sure that he does.
$500 toilet seats? That is literally nothing! My wife is a defense contract auditor. The yearly amount of fraud she catches annually is millions. So what happens to the money? Well usually political figures show up to defend the poor contractors (contrubutors) and the higher ups (political appointees) just let them have it. Only fear of never working again has kept us from going to 60 minutes.
I’m a regular on this site but because her e-mail is read (and some times censored), and because the patriot act is not friendly to government workers who dissent (or their husbands) I’m not leaving my name this time.
John Isbell
September 18, 2003 at 5:33 pm
5I wish I could think of a comment for _, but I guess you’ve reviewed the options. I do have one thought: probably the most decent person in the Senate now is Feingold, the only vote against the Patriot Act (99-1). I think you could trust him if you made an anonymous contact (to start with at least). Of course, this may be common knowledge in the Senate, but maybe not. He’s also the kind of guy who fights: McCain-Feingold was not easy.
Great post, natch. I had some lame joke and it’s this: I just think we should all have faith and trust the president and by the way I’m no longer a virgin.
Steve Jones
September 18, 2003 at 11:34 pm
6McCain held hearings on this lease arrangement, and is vehemently opposed to the deal. _, if you do drop a note to Feingold, cc McCain. He’s been channeling Bill Proxmire lately.
I have faith and trust the president, and now I’m a virgin again!
rachael
September 20, 2003 at 2:27 pm
7are these actual excerpts or do you write for the onion? i thought HAMMER was a code word for 8-BALL and TOILET SEAT meant CASE OF MOET. neither of these are made in america, so i don’t get it.
Anonymous
September 21, 2003 at 7:22 pm
8John Isbel,
According to my wife, most of the contractors she audits are honest, and helpful, making the audit easy and enjoyable. Some are honest but incompetent, some are dishonest and incompetent, and a few are dishonest and competent. They are the problem.
On the one major issue that “60 Minutes” would lead the season with, my wife was between a corporation and about $20-30 million of fraudulent billing. This is enough money to make it worth the corporation’s time to enlist congressmen and former military elite (generals and admirals). It was not a surprise that owners of the corporation are personal friends of Bush. The shocking thing that came to light was that the congressman who made her bosses stand down was a liberal from out west, someone known as a champion for liberal causes.
It’s easy to say that it is her duty to bring this fraud to light, but we enjoy our life and we know that life as we know it, would end if she did. Last year Time Magazine had 3 whistle blowers as persons of the year, that’s great. What they didn’t show was the 99% of all whistle blowers who never work again, lose their homes, suffer depression, etc. Remember the confidential whistle blower hot line installed under Clinton. It’s not there any more. Remember Jeffrey Weygand (sp?)who ratted out the Tobacco industry? Even 60 Minutes left him to hang in the wind.
My wife still does her work well, she feels bitter that what she does is being short circuited by corruption, but like most folk she just goes on and concentrates on the good things of the job and life.
Oh and the big kicker? W is looking to privatize her job so that a corporation would now watch out for America’s interest.
I especially don’t want to sign my name now.