Some of you have asked why I’ve spent so little time commenting on the approaching California recall election. It’s heating up, you say, and the people of California are awaiting the firm, guiding hand of Fanatical Apathy to tell them what to think, how to vote, and where to hide afterwards.
Honestly, I find the whole thing incredibly sad. Where the news media finds their first easy laughs since Uday and Qusay met their hi-larious slapstick end, I see only tragedy. A disused trapdoor was found and opened at the bottom of the old-fashioned pyjamas of California politics. So it should surprise no one what’s going to come out of it.
California has what some would call a “strong” governorship, full of powers, obligations, and responsibilities. It’s not a glorified figurehead position with little power and generous vacation time that can be easily and painlessly fobbed off on any boob that stumbles down the pike with his pants around his ankles and a fistful of dollars. Like, say, Texas.
And California needs leadership now, and needs it badly. They feel betrayed by leaders who promise one thing and do another. No more broken pledges or misleading assessments - they needs a governor who’s going to stand up and say something like, “Now, we face a severe budget shortfall. Its sheer magnitude boggles the mind and threatens the unprecedented progress we’ve made together. This is a national crisis, afflicting nearly every state in America. We didn’t seek it, but we do not shirk from it. We didn’t produce it, but we will prevail against it… In the meantime, we must tighten our belts without hardening our hearts. And, to the extent possible, protect our progress in public education, public safety and children’s health insurance. Now is not the time for pomp and circumstance, but for hard work, hard truth and hard choices.”
Okay, that was from Gray Davis’ inaugural address back in January. But you see my point - out with the bastards, it’s time to get someone who says things like that into the statehouse.
It’s tempting to blame the people of California for this one, but that’s only because it’s their fault. They’ve accepted more bad propositions than a drunk debutante with low self-esteem, including Proposition 37 (”Why Not Cut Property, Income, and Sales Taxes, Just ‘Cuz?”), Proposition 183 (”The Comprehensive Land Grant For Anyone Who Asks Act”), and Proposition 42 (The “Let’s Buy Everyone a Latte and Ask the Money Fairy to Pay For It” Amendment). In retrospect, I’m sure a lot of Californians wish they hadn’t voted for some of those. Though I’d bet that this won’t stop ‘em from trying to fix the fiscal crisis with yet another ill-conceived ballot item (like Proposition 25 - The “Let’s Tap Nevada on the Shoulder, Point Towards Colorado, and Then Take Their Wallets While They’re Looking the Other Way” Initiative). What needs fixing is the Californian tendency to govern by committee, where that committee is defined as “all voters.”
So what’s my advice for my California readers? Vote against the recall. Not because Davis is a good Governor. Just look at it as your chance to help your state back away from its extracurricular voting habit, one day at a time.





13 comments
Linkmeister
September 14, 2003 at 6:08 pm
1Twelve-step programs for voters? What a concept!
Murray
September 14, 2003 at 6:55 pm
2OK California, (or Cullyfornya, if you are an alien), put that ballot initiative down, and back way slowly, now one will get hurt.
Another alternative.
(In the voice of Issa who started this mess)
California, you have been detected, stand away from the ballot box.
Can California help it if they have figured out that by bypassing the politicians they can reach tax giveaway heaven? Sort of like giving an alcoholic the keys to a bar. As long as reality has no part in the equation, why not believe that a man who pretends to be some one (or thing) else for a living, can magically not increase taxes, not decrease services, and still balance the budget with a really powerful audit that will find all of the hidden money and gold and jewels.
Rick
September 14, 2003 at 8:47 pm
3Here’s the easy solution… if it were illegal to pay people to gather signatures for propositions, then only propositions that had a real, honest to God grassroots base (as opposed to a money base) would get enough signatures to make it onto a ballot.
Now if we could just get rid of that silly electoral college…
Marla
September 15, 2003 at 9:34 am
4Hey, could you come down here and run?
Chicory
September 15, 2003 at 11:51 am
5“….can magically not increase taxes, not decrease services, and still balance the budget with a really powerful audit…”
Murray, that’s how Enron got into trouble. Maybe Lay should be running for governor
Dee
September 15, 2003 at 1:46 pm
6“They’ve accepted more bad propositions than a drunk debutante with low self-esteem”
Let me just wipe this coffee off my monitor…..
Ken, Just Ken...
September 15, 2003 at 2:51 pm
7When will people realize that Ballot initiatives are just bad government?
There’s a reason we have representative government. People who have to time and experience to study the pros and cons of issues, rather than having the public vote on these poorly, or worse yet, deceptively worded proposals.
If you don’t like how the legislature and/or the governor is dealing with the issues, vote against them in the next election… no “do overs.”
I live in Oregon and we have dozens of initiatives on the ballot every year. There’s no way most people can figure out what most of these would do, and they’ve even made it illegal for the legislature to reverse these new laws even if they don’t work.
We’ve gone to voting parties where everyone at the party tries to work out what each of the initiatives would do and sometimes we were more confused afterwards as to the effects.
Come on people, let your representatives do their jobs… and if you feel stronly about an issue, talk them into voting for your issue. That’s what they’re there for.
…sorry for the rant…
tess
September 15, 2003 at 3:30 pm
8i really love how ahnold has been advertizing that we can magically fix the budget by “opening the books and getting rid of government waste.” makes me wonder if he’s going to fix the budget by also looking for spare change in his couch.
John Isbell
September 15, 2003 at 5:18 pm
9That’s some great propositions ya got there, kiddo.
The recall’s been delayed. In consequence, Arnold is dead and doesn’t know it, IMO. It’s going to be harder to get him saturation TV coverage in a March revival tour. Tonight he’s on Larry King (after Oprah this morning), which could be kind of funny, if you’re cruel. I’m not, so I don’t get to watch it. I’ll just fantasize. He’s such a girly-man, I bet I could take him.
I justify the preceding paragraph through my belief that Arnold is a pig and a Waldheim-lover they all hoped to foist on California by violating democracy. You know, I may just switch on Larry King.
Murray
September 15, 2003 at 5:22 pm
10Chicory, (Hail to the Victors)
Why not let Kenny Boy run for Governor? It would hardly make it any less (or more) of a circus. He could run on the campaign that Davis caused the energy shortfall last year. (no less of a bald faced hypocritical lie than you would get from W).
Aanold, said in his speach that a really strong audit would show where the hidden money is and that should be enough to fix the problem.
Almost every candidate runs on W,F, and A (waste, fraud and abuse), cleans out a little from the past office holder, adds his own, and then the next one runs on W,F, and A. And guess what? To the voting public it always sounds new.
Ish
September 16, 2003 at 4:36 pm
11But have you read the latest ruling? Appeals Court Rules that California Recall Must Last Until the End of Time.
Steve Jones
September 16, 2003 at 4:53 pm
12No, no, no, no, no, I cannot agree with the proposition that a more direct democracy through initiative and referendum is a bad thing. I’m in Arizona, where our founders originally had I&R (to abbr.) in the proposed constitution. Taft demanded that we take them out. We did. Then immediately after statehood, the legislature suggested an amendment, which the people passed. Take that, fat boy!
The trouble is not with selfish, deluded and confused people using direct democracy. The problem is that we are selfish, deluded and confused people. Democracy takes work to maintain, and besides being S, D & C, we’re lazy. And busy. Are you telling me that my representative, JD Hayworth, is a better arbiter of legislation than the people of his district? HAH! This man is a hopeless yes-man for Tom DeLay. As for the state legislature, we call the The 90 Dwarves for a reason. They spend 2/3 of their time trying to foist a fundamentalist Christian agenda on us every stinking year. Covenant marriage. Abortion bills. Sex education limited to abstinence-only programs. Mandatory minimums. Kill every tax. Turn education over to the churches. It goes on and on. I expect to trip over a Ten Commandment monument in the Capitol next year.
I agree that initiatives can be badly worded, and badly sold. When the (paid) petition-gatherers were selling us our medicinal marijuana initiative as a way to “strenghten drug sentences”, I refused to sign. After I read the thing, I voted for it. Didn’t work, as the Dwarves mandated that doctors who prescribed would lose their licenses until the FDA approved it.
So I say keep democracy as direct as possible. And read the damn things instead of watching the crappy ads.
Phew! That felt good. Like Ken, I apologize for the rant.
Steve Jones
September 16, 2003 at 5:11 pm
13And another thing…
If you read it and it makes no sense, vote no. If it passes, well, that’s democracy for ya!
(”…we call them The 90 Dwarves for a reason…”)