I’ve just returned from a media luncheon, hosted by “The Week” magazine. The panel consisted of Sidney Blumenthal, Monica Crowley, Gary Hart, Ed Rollins, and moderator Harold Evans. The topic was “Is Bush Unbeatable in 2004?”
Naturally, when I received my invitation I immediately resolved not to hog too much of the limelight. As the only (declared) presidential candidate in attendance, I thought it would be bad form to take too much advantage of my access to the media. No, I told myself, in fairness to my fellow candidates I would try to stay focussed on the issue at hand amid the inevitable firestorm of questions that would be put to me.
It was therefore an unpleasant surprise, as I sat down modestly towards the back of the room (next to, by the way, the lovely and estimable Mad Kane), that I began to notice a distinct lack of “buzz” around my presence. In fact, during the entire discussion (in which, predictably, the Democrats talked about Issues and the Republicans talked about Strategy), my name was not mentioned. Not once. At first I thought it was out of respect for my privacy, but when I met Eric Alterman afterwards and introduced myself, he seemed to recognize me not as a presidential candidate, but only as “Charlie Pierce’s friend, from that show…”
Clearly, there’s a problem in my campaign. And like our Commander in Chief, when a problem arises, I know not to point the finger at myself. So I’ve decided to rush an announcement that I’d been intending to save for a more opportune moment (like for instance, the Democratic National Convention):
As of today, my running mate for the Presidency in 2004 is Peter Sagal.
Some of you may be a bit shocked that I’d usurp Fanny the Roborat so abruptly, but it’s been pointed out that Fanny is underage, underfunded, and - frankly - a rat. I assure you that Fanny will still help with the campaign, and she will be a valuable part of any Felber administration. This is just an important step in an evolving campaign, and my strategists tell me that Bush has pretty much locked down the rat vote anyway.

[Future Vice President Sagal: The best
life insurance policy a candidate
could ever want.]
Here, then, is a statement from your next Vice President:
“I believe that Adam Felber is the finest, most qualified candidate in the race, and it is my honor to do whatever I can to help him achieve that goal. Not for me. But for the American people.
And, of course, if, upon being elected, he were to suddenly come across some completely accidental death, something like having a weight dropped on his head while he waited on a specific street corner at a specific time, I would feel obligated to serve out his term in the way that he would want it done.
And, of course, take his wife into my home as my second spouse, as our ancient tradition as Jews demands.
And take his PS2, because I don’t have one.”
Thank you, Peter. Welcome to the campaign trail. I’d like to see ‘em try to ignore us at luncheons now.





22 comments
janna
July 16, 2003 at 3:51 pm
1“…and my strategists tell me that Bush has pretty much locked down the rat vote anyway.”
Hee! Best moment of my day. This will keep me giggling until next November.
Linkmeister
July 16, 2003 at 3:59 pm
2Um, no offense to Peter, but I submit that if you’d taken Fanny to luncheons perhaps you would not have been ignored. She has a, well, presence, don’t you know?
t.a.
July 16, 2003 at 5:27 pm
3“the best insurance a candidate could want”
so you’re taking the strategy of a veep who is so repellant, so offensive to all living humans, that they would prefer you to remain alive & president?
that’ll certainly save you the cost of hiring food tasters. i can’t wait to see who nominate to the supreme court. or who we invade first. woohoo.
Peter
July 16, 2003 at 5:49 pm
4God, I’m in the race for like two minutes, and the abuse begins. Have we learned nothing, people?
Tom
July 16, 2003 at 6:15 pm
5Good move! Although I think I should get some credit for proposing this in the first place last week…I will stand firm in my support of the Felber/Sagal ticket! Not only does this mean that we could finally get a President with a great sense of humor and intelligence (which our currently kind-of-elected leader of the free world has neither!), the Vice-Presidental candidate isn’t being kept going by a medical device! Peter sounds smart and funny too! What we need in the highest corridors of power are people who are smart enough to know when the wool is being pulled over their eyes, people who can find the humor in silly things, and people who can present themselves well even when off the radio!
And since Carl probably has the positon of Press Secretary all locked up, how about if I nominate myself for the newly created position of Technology Secretary, where my first act will be to insure that Orrin Hatch’s boneheaded plan of destroying the computers of music sharers will never be implemented!
Felber and Sagal in 2004…where’s the nominating convention going to be?
This really isn’t so far out…us in California may get the choice to vote for an old body-builder and actor in the recall…Adam and Peter are much more electable!
Tom in California!
jerry
July 16, 2003 at 7:02 pm
6In a move towards bipartisanship, I offer my services as National Security Advisor. My conservative credentials help stave the admittedly tired “He’s liberal and therefore weak on national defense” arguement that still persists and being from Texas would help you on the anti-Yankee front in the South.
It would be like Nixon going to China (well, ok - it wouldn’t. But I still would vote for you and Peter solely so Wait, Wait … would replace the regular weekly Presidential Radio Address.)
Jerry
the conserva-troll
Felber - Sagal ‘04
michael
July 16, 2003 at 8:28 pm
7Excellent move. I’ve been complaining for some time that the current administration has been very sloppy about getting to station-breaks on time.
Dee
July 16, 2003 at 10:18 pm
8I don’t really give a rat’s a… I mean, Peter is a FINE runing mate. Just don’t forget my Ambassadorship to Fiji.
And as far as “the best insurance a candidate could want,” I have two words for you — Dan Quayle.
Mad Kane
July 17, 2003 at 1:50 am
9Hi and thanks much for the mention!
It was great meeting you. And I can only hope you’ll forgive me for my somewhat different interpretation of yesterday’s events: http://www.madkane.com/notable05_03a.html#07_17_03
tim
July 17, 2003 at 8:29 am
10I work in an oil refinery, which puts me one up on Spencer Abraham, so can I be Energy Secretary?
That or the head of the proposed (by me) President’s Special Council on Internet Pornography. I have some very unique qualifications in this area that you may be interested in.
Mary
July 17, 2003 at 10:07 am
11All right!!! Felber/Sagal in ‘04. Time to crank up the ol’ Photoshop(tm) and get some new buttons made.
!!!
ralph
July 17, 2003 at 10:43 am
12I call dibs on head of the FCC! I look forward to the look on Rupert Murdoch’s and Randy Michaels’ faces when the Felber/Sagal ticket is inaugurated and they realize that their worst nightmare is about to come true.
Dugrless
July 17, 2003 at 11:24 am
13Can we expect an all NPR cabinet? Or will you feel politically bound to include a few token PRI economic advisors and maybe even an MPR Secretary of Folksy-ness?
John Isbell
July 17, 2003 at 1:02 pm
14Hello jerry the conserva-troll. Bipartisan appointments are nice.
What I want to know, Adam, is, which 16 words did Peter pressure you to put in this announcement?
I also notice that you have Ralphie posting. I voted for you in 2000 and what did I get? Dick Butkiss.
Trim
July 17, 2003 at 3:57 pm
15Okay, I may sound like a real idiot, but who IS that guy? That’s not Peter Sagal, is it? It sorta looks like him, but it looks like he just emerged from a pressure cooker. And this guy’s male-pattern baldness doesn’t match his. What’s the deal?
You know, body doubles (ala Saddam) only have to stand in at public functions, not photos.
Elayne Riggs
July 17, 2003 at 4:19 pm
16I’m all pouty now. The two best NYC comedy bloggers sitting right next to each other and The Week never even invited me? Pout pout. Bitch moan. Honestly.
Sharoney
July 17, 2003 at 11:18 pm
17And will “Cackling Charles” Pierce be named Secretary of Dee-fense?
Charles Pierce
July 18, 2003 at 2:51 pm
18I am sulking on my front porch. If you think Felber can go back on his word the way he has and fob me off with SecDef, you got the wrong Leon Czolgosz for the wrong Bill McKinley, pals.
What possible reason could there be for this betrayal? What votes does Sagal bring that Felber didn’t have already? What about the papists? Who’s bringing them into the Big Felber Tent? Who’s going to tend bar once we get inside? I am tired of being led around by the Felber Leadership Council wing of the Felber Party.
I await your response.
adam
July 19, 2003 at 2:52 pm
19“SecDef?” Never, Charlie, never. Something better. SecState.
See, my thinking is thus: Peter’s got another baby on the way. So he needs access to our finest Undisclosed Locations, well-appointed accommodations where he can govern effectively whilst changing diapers.
You’re a different story. Your kids are older. A little travel now and then would be great, right? And lemme sweeten the pot:
Except for England, we’re pretty much out of allies now. So we need to build new alliances. Howsabout if I let YOU choose our next coalition of the willing? A few extended visits to strategically important nations like Aruba, Bermuda, and Fiji might hit the spot, yes?
Plus, you can manage the campaign. And we’ll nationalize baseball and make you commissioner. Plus, there’s reason to believe that Venezuela might be manufacturing WMD’s. Since it’s the rubber-band capital of the world, that might be a pretty sweet windfall for your enormous office supply business, no?
Peter
July 19, 2003 at 4:52 pm
20I’d like to announce that Willa Sagal, soon to be Third Second Daughter of the Nation, was born on 7/18/03, at about twelve noon. There was a release of pigeons, which, let me tell you, scared the hell out of the OB/GYN attending.
Mother and baby are fine; father will be taking two weeks off from his official duties, viz. fixing quick release weights to streetlights above the northwest corner of 23rd and 5th.
Peter
July 19, 2003 at 4:53 pm
21And Charlie — let’s talk more about this intriguing Czolgosz reference.
P.
Ras_Nesta
July 21, 2003 at 1:21 pm
22“sweeten the pot”, Adam?
I want to apply for the ambassadorship to where the pot’s sweetest, the Netherlands.