To: All administration personnel
From: Karl Rove
Re: Language, people, language!
Everyone has been performing beautifully of late. Especially the President. I am pleased.
But it’s time to finalize the WMD language shift. We’ve been moving towards it, but the Brits have already arrived at the final pre-weapons-find language mark, and we’re lagging. Here’s a brush-up on the main gist:
In all statements regarding our finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, please insert “evidence of” before the phrase “WMD’s.” Alternatively, you may choose to append “programs” to any use of the word “weapons.”
So, for example, the sentence, “We have complete confidence that we are going to find WMD’s in Iraq,” now becomes “We have complete confidence that we are going to find evidence of WMD’s in Iraq.” The more informal statement, “We’re gonna find those weapons,” becomes “We’re gonna find those weapons programs.” See? “Right before the war, Iraq had illegal weapons programs.” Give it a try - it’s easy. [You too, Rummy.]
When a reporter, a Democrat, or any other traitor asks you about your wording, please deny there’s been any shift whatsoever and restate your sentence in the original phrasing (without “programs” and “evidence of”). The restatement should be accompanied by a tolerant smirk or eye-roll, as in “Look at the pedants I have to deal with here! Honestly!” This might seem contradictory or counterintuitive, but you must all, as ever, trust me. Eventually, they’ll tire of asking that question and the new formulation will attain preeminence.
It has come to my attention that some of you have been asking each other privately if we are indeed really going to find the WMD’s. The fact that you are asking shows a lack of trust. I am displeased. I trust you all, and the fact that my wiretaps and surveillance networks have shown that several of you are voicing these doubts makes it clear that this great trust is not always returned. This is troubling.
Still, I understand that these are difficult times, and I am inclined to forgive. All of you can rest assured that you may bathe in the dark and terrible light of my forgiveness and be cleansed therein. For behold! I have raised thee to greatness in accordance with our Pact, and the mighty tremble at your coming. Can anyone doubt the products of my preternatural Vision? Can you? Nay. So go forth, my beautiful minions, and continue our great works in my Name.
Hugs,
Karl





9 comments
Murray
July 10, 2003 at 4:40 pm
1George Orwell knew that controlling the language, controls the masses. Karl is such a good student.
Linkmeister
July 10, 2003 at 9:46 pm
2Karl’s got minions, Fanny needs minions, all God’s chillun need minions.
Anonymous
July 10, 2003 at 10:55 pm
3I like: ‘…no longer believe actual weapons of mass destruction…’
But the other not actual type they still expect to find.
Landis
July 10, 2003 at 11:32 pm
4I absolutely LOVE his ending salutation! “The softer side of Rove.”
Hugs,
Landis
John Isbell
July 11, 2003 at 12:34 am
5The Daily Show had a great piece on this. They didn’t get all the fuss about the little word “not.”
Anonymous
July 11, 2003 at 9:02 am
6Words, words, words…”evidence of…”, “…programs”, “…not…” - what’s a few extra words among historical/political revisionists? It’s all in how you use them, is it not?
Chicory
July 11, 2003 at 9:11 am
7Does one now say there “was possible evidence of” Saddam trying to buy uranium from Africa? It fits with the rest. That Karl. He sure nows how to rotate, er, spin.
John Isbell
July 11, 2003 at 12:39 pm
8Actually, there was indisputable evidence of Saddam trying to buy uranium from Africa. It’s just that it was forged.
Bob
July 11, 2003 at 4:33 pm
9All of this is moot, as there is new evidence that Saddam tried to buy uranium at an Elkart, Indiana WalMart. Fortunately, they were out.