Comments on: Supreme Court Roundup http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/ America's favorite blog Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:26:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Don http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1351 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1351 Once again we give you our thanks, Adam, for keeping us up to date on the critical matters that somehow keeping "falling below the radar" of the Mainstream Media. I am particularly impressed by the manner in which that Great Sovereign Republic of Texas maintains its position on the ragged cutting edge of so many of these vital issues. And I am certain that your readers will experience a heightened level of respect for those distinguished members of the Court that you have quoted for our benefit and edification. Once again we give you our thanks, Adam, for keeping us up to date on the critical matters that somehow keeping “falling below the radar” of the Mainstream Media.

I am particularly impressed by the manner in which that Great Sovereign Republic of Texas maintains its position on the ragged cutting edge of so many of these vital issues.

And I am certain that your readers will experience a heightened level of respect for those distinguished members of the Court that you have quoted for our benefit and edification.

]]> by: Chicory http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1352 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1352 I was going to comment but Don's erudite review has me in awe. Much like the remarks of Thomas and Scalia do. Or, is that shock. Shock and Awe! That's what it is. ;-D I was going to comment but Don’s erudite review has me in awe. Much like the remarks of Thomas and Scalia do. Or, is that shock.

Shock and Awe! That’s what it is. ;-D

]]> by: Cygna http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1353 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1353 Nahhhh, most of these would never happen, because doesn't Thomas vote with Scalia, like, 100% of the time? He did his first year or two, at least. Nahhhh, most of these would never happen, because doesn’t Thomas vote with Scalia, like, 100% of the time? He did his first year or two, at least.

]]> by: Catherine http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1354 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1354 Or as the Capitol Steps put it, "How do you solve a problem like Scalia?" Or as the Capitol Steps put it, “How do you solve a problem like Scalia?”

]]> by: Jon H http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1355 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1355 Thanks Adam, for helping to alert the nation to this assault on States' Straight White Non-Buggering Citizens' Rights. Thanks Adam, for helping to alert the nation to this assault on States’ Straight White Non-Buggering Citizens’ Rights.

]]> by: Kyria http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1356 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1356 Hey Adam, I found your blog! Now all I have to do is read it. - Kyria Hey Adam, I found your blog! Now all I have to do is read it.

- Kyria

]]> by: Kevin http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1357 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1357 Re: Tinsley v. Bordick Having spent more time in Kentucky than I care to admit, I must take issue with the "darker than rye bread" comment. Kentuckians are almost totally unaware of the concept of rye bread. In fact, I'm not sure that a native of that state would be able to identify a bread product that wasn't white. On the plus side, Kentucky is relatively Starbuck's-free. That's about the only good thing I can say.... Re: Tinsley v. Bordick

Having spent more time in Kentucky than I care to admit, I must take issue with the “darker than rye bread” comment. Kentuckians are almost totally unaware of the concept of rye bread. In fact, I’m not sure that a native of that state would be able to identify a bread product that wasn’t white. On the plus side, Kentucky is relatively Starbuck’s-free. That’s about the only good thing I can say….

]]> by: senor robot http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1358 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1358 Adam, any time you can use the word "uppity" is just plain funny. Adam, any time you can use the word “uppity” is just plain funny.

]]> by: John Isbell http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1359 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/27/supreme-court-roundup/#comment-1359 "How do you solve a problem like Scalia?" That's one I'll remember. Adam, I've just emailed a bunch of your posts, twice, to various people. Is it me or are you getting more brutal with the years? In a gentlemanly way. “How do you solve a problem like Scalia?”
That’s one I’ll remember. Adam, I’ve just emailed a bunch of your posts, twice, to various people. Is it me or are you getting more brutal with the years? In a gentlemanly way.

]]>