Despite Promise, Gay Boy Scout Ousted
The story linked above is yet another, um, blow to the Boy Scouts and their image. Why are the Boy Scouts of America so obsessed with ferreting out gay scouts and scoutmasters? Even the supposedly open-minded Philadelphia branch has suddenly revealed that it had a secret “don’t-ask, don’t-tell, and don’t-tell-about-’don’t-ask-don’t-tell’” policy.
Generally this level of struggle and denial belies something deeper. Which brings us to our present line of inquiry: Just how gay are the Boy Scouts?
As an effete New Yorker and amateur semiotician with many gay friends and a tendency to hang around with a permissive crowd of writers, performers, and even musical theater types, I believe I’m eminently qualified to help answer this particular question.
[Before we begin, one admission: I was more or less kicked out of the Cub Scouts when I was 8 years old. From the start I was too much of a wiseacre to fit in, but the precipitating event was when Otto, my new German Shepherd puppy, ate my scout-issued balsa wood race car kit. It was to have been assembled for a rally to be held in my elementary school’s gymnasium the next week. At the next meeting when my Den Mother, Mrs. Magro, asked where my balsa wood racer was, I naturally replied “My dog ate it.” This led to riotous laughter from my fellow scouts and an angry tirade from Mrs. Magro, which included the enraged assertion that had she been my second grade teacher, she would have never allowed me to advance to the third grade. The other scouts sat in stunned silence at this as Mrs. Magro composed herself and I silently vowed to one day tar Mrs. Magro’s entire organization with a satirical essay that I would publish on some sort of worldwide computer network. But I don’t think that this compromises my objectivity.]
Okay, to business:
Exhibit A: We Love a Man in a Uniform
It was, perhaps, only mere happenstance that there wasn’t a guy dressed as a scoutmaster in the Village People. After all, the uniform is primarily there for its own sake; there is no opposing team they need to distinguish themselves from, there’s no enemy forces to do battle with. It’s just a snazzy uniform, complete with identifying kerchiefs. And it’s pretty hot.

Exhibit B: Classic Scout Iconography
They’ve toned it down in recent years, but there’s no denying that the Scouts long clung to a style of self-representation that the Ancient Greeks would have found a bit over-the-top. Depicting boys at the moment of puberty in short pants cavorting in the fresh air with their fellows and a few benevolent “masters” isn’t necessarily gay, or even sexual. But look at these from the point of view of a healthy adolescent gay male…


Exhibit C: The He-Man Woman Haters’ Club
But all this begs the question - say, isn’t it possible that the Scouts are just sexy, and not necessarily homosexy? Despite the kerchiefs? Yes, it’s possible. But visit the Boy Scouts’ extremely comprehensive website, and you’ll find everything that might concern a teen boy, from sports to outdoormanship to computer games to straight talk about drugs to religion to physical fitness. Everything, I say, that might be of interest to a teenage boy… except girls. Of the fair sex, we see next to nothing - no advice, no information, not even dire warnings or screeds in favor of abstinence as one finds on the subject of drugs. Nothing.
Unlike drugs, girls are not a problem as far as the Scouts are concerned. To what sort of 16 year-old boy (or middle-aged scoutmaster) are girls not a probelm?

Conclusion
So, how gay are the Scouts? My expert analysis is that they’re not “really, really gay” but probably gayer than “somewhat gay” and certainly not “not gay.” Most likely, the Scouts are somewhere between “moderately gay” and “pretty darn gay.” This means that they could be fun and fulfilling for gay and straight people alike. The fact that they’re embarked on a crusade to purge their ranks of gays… well, that’s sad. Future Scouts may Be Prepared, but they’ll never be fabulous.





15 comments
richpizor
June 12, 2003 at 6:25 pm
1The disclaimer, though enlightening, wasn’t technically necessary. The Cub Scouts, though affiliated loosely with the Boy Scouts, is in fact an entirely seperate organization. Therefore no dark feelings you have about the former should, in theory, affect your objectivity toward the latter.
:)
Pat R.
June 12, 2003 at 6:28 pm
2Adam, re: Mrs. Magro — your objectivity has never been in question.
No, no, wait, sorry — has ALWAYS been in question, that’s the word I was looking for. Your objectivity has always been in question. Which has never, of course, been an obstacle to your fabulousness.
W. was also a Cub Scout, BTW. Probably went AWOL in his last year, setting a pattern for later life. He apparently supports the Scouts in their purging of the, er, fabulous from their ranks. Which of course only underlines his glaring lack of, well, fabulousness.
Don
June 12, 2003 at 8:43 pm
3Somehow this seems to harmonize with the old joke:
A: “When I was a boy I joined the Girl Scouts.”
B: “But, since you were a boy, shouldn’t you have joined the Boy Scouts?”
A: “Look. You scout for what you want to, and I’ll scout for what I want to.”
Just seem to all fit together, somehow.
Mike Z
June 12, 2003 at 9:44 pm
4Gotta love the guys snuggling in the tent and the suggestive bagpipes. Actually, it looks like there may be a lot of pitching of tents going on. Can you earn a patch for that?
craig
June 13, 2003 at 2:20 am
5The satire is, as usual, spot on, Adam.
For the honesty’s sake, allow me to clarify a couple of things.
You are correct. The Cub Scouts ARE part of the Boy Scouts of America (as are the Tiger Scouts, Webeloes, Explorers, and Varsity Scouts).
Second, the dirty secret (that the BSA does not want to officially admit) is that the reason that it is so anti-gay and anti-atheist is that a large amount of the organization’s funding and volunteer leadership comes from the Catholic and Mormon churches. Like the Republican Party, the BSA knows not to piss off it’s major contributors.
John Isbell
June 13, 2003 at 12:49 pm
6Great post, and the last picture is particularly fabulous, though I do like the tent one. You have certainly wreaked your long-planned revenge on Mrs. Thingy, thanks to your prophetic vision of a world computer system. Are you by any chance Al Gore? GWB OTOH (can I compose a sentence entirely of acronyms?) is many things, but definitely NOT fabulous. Well, OK, a little in his flight suit.
Nice thread too.
[Pedant alert: “belied” is wrong, though.]
MeanTim
June 13, 2003 at 2:06 pm
7I’m a former boy scout so I think I have some insight into this matter. I don’t think the boy scouts are gay…. although now that I think about it I did get into quite a bit of trouble when I was caught smoking cigarettes with and kissing a girl scout (both troops were having camping trips at the same campsite.) At the time I wasn’t sure if the scoutmasters were more angry about me sneaking cigarettes on camping trips or that I was corrupting the poor girl (THEY WERE HER CIGGERETTES BTW, but I didn’t mention that to the scoutmasters
), but on further reflection perhaps it was a concerted effort to scare the heterosexual out of me!
Frank
June 13, 2003 at 8:21 pm
8The position of that bagpiper in the composition of the picture is hilarious.
Rana
June 14, 2003 at 12:56 am
9And his eyes!
Anonymous
June 14, 2003 at 4:29 pm
10Add one more image, the Boy Scout of America statue near the white house in D.C.
boy scout with naked guy
Chicory
June 16, 2003 at 11:20 am
11Too fabulous! Too funny!
John Isbell
June 16, 2003 at 5:15 pm
12I must mention this: my English brother-in-law, who’s pretty much GOP but being English finds Bush ridiculous, claims there’s a Cheney quote that Bush enjoys wearing his flight suit and has had pyjamas made imitating it.
Make of the claim what you will. I guess I might google it.
Wayne Altman
June 26, 2003 at 2:08 am
13There are several reasons the scouting program does not allow homos to be members if they reveal themselves.
#1. The program is based on reverance to God, since no God condones faggotry, no dice in scouts.
#2. I agree most scouting troops are primarily funded by these churches, and a good way to piss off a church is to reveal you have faggots in with thier children.
#3. Since there are very few degenerate homos with sons of thier own, makes it tougher to find a good butt pirate to lead the boys.
#4. Most people with any sense what-so-ever would never want thier kids any where near the train wreck of that type of person.
While I understand this comming from an asinine web site that does not understand what an awesome leader George W is, I did not expect it to be listed under humor. It is certainly not funny.
Anonymous
July 26, 2003 at 11:05 pm
14Since Mr. Altman willingly admits that he is a George W. fan, we can certainly ignore the rest of his comments.
Perhaps the scouts will still be a learning experience for all kinds of boys…
ryan johnston
July 29, 2003 at 4:37 am
15just read w altmans comments,now who says americans cant do irony?