Comments on: Let’s Pretend http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/ America's favorite blog Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:03:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Jin Wicked http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1204 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1204 Let's pretend that I just read your post, and as long as we're pretending that, that I also listen to you on the radio and just found out about your blog, and since we're saying all that happened, that I enjoyed reading it immensely. I also liked all the wedding pics -- too cool. =) -- Jin Let’s pretend that I just read your post, and as long as we’re pretending that, that I also listen to you on the radio and just found out about your blog, and since we’re saying all that happened, that I enjoyed reading it immensely. I also liked all the wedding pics — too cool. =) — Jin

]]> by: Farberwear http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1205 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1205 Republican Senators on the take? Boy, am I shocked. Republican Senators on the take? Boy, am I shocked.

]]> by: Linkmeister http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1206 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1206 Funny, I just read the same article you did, Adam. Also read the one where Delay spoke to Rove/Bush about the Texas redistricting ploy. Funny, I just read the same article you did, Adam. Also read the one where Delay spoke to Rove/Bush about the Texas redistricting ploy.

]]> by: Pat R. http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1207 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1207 Now hold on -- are you implying that these righteous, clean-cut, god-fearing, church-going, Saddam-dumping public figures have allowed the lust for power to impair their judgment to the point of prostituting themselves for $$$$ and systematically lying to the public, whom they are supposed to serve? Is that what you're saying? Damn. You'd think the public would want to know about information like that. You'd think the public would be concerned, even outraged that there might be a pattern of deception and corruption that could lead to things like, say, forcing that same public to cover an incompetent business's massive debt. Or to invading another country under the pretext of 'liberation' at the cost of thousands of innocent civilian lives, not to mention the lives of many good young Americans. The American public would want to know about things like that. Wouldn't they? Now hold on — are you implying that these righteous, clean-cut, god-fearing, church-going, Saddam-dumping public figures have allowed the lust for power to impair their judgment to the point of prostituting themselves for $$$$ and systematically lying to the public, whom they are supposed to serve? Is that what you’re saying?

Damn. You’d think the public would want to know about information like that. You’d think the public would be concerned, even outraged that there might be a pattern of deception and corruption that could lead to things like, say, forcing that same public to cover an incompetent business’s massive debt. Or to invading another country under the pretext of ‘liberation’ at the cost of thousands of innocent civilian lives, not to mention the lives of many good young Americans.

The American public would want to know about things like that. Wouldn’t they?

]]> by: Bob http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1208 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1208 Did any of these businessmen or Congressmen cheat on their spouses, then lie about it under oath? If not, then I can't see why the American people would be the least bit interested. Because, when you come right down to it, that's the only aspect of character that really matters, right? Did any of these businessmen or Congressmen cheat on their spouses, then lie about it under oath? If not, then I can’t see why the American people would be the least bit interested. Because, when you come right down to it, that’s the only aspect of character that really matters, right?

]]> by: Mark N. http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1209 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1209 --- Ken Johnson, a spokesman for Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said, "No one on our committee is going to risk going to jail over a campaign contribution. There was never any implied or expressed quid pro quo." --- I enjoy how he brought up jail time on his own. Is he concerned about jail time? —
Ken Johnson, a spokesman for Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said, “No one on our committee is going to risk going to jail over a campaign contribution. There was never any implied or expressed quid pro quo.”
—

I enjoy how he brought up jail time on his own. Is he concerned about jail time?

]]> by: Abe http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1210 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1210 I'm hoping like hell Bob posed his questions with his tongue deeply in his cheek. 'Cause if he didn't, if there are people actually thinking along those lines, the Republicans have nothing to fear and we are all deeply f- -- why, hello, Mrs. Felber! I’m hoping like hell Bob posed his questions with his tongue deeply in his cheek. ‘Cause if he didn’t, if there are people actually thinking along those lines, the Republicans have nothing to fear and we are all deeply f- — why, hello, Mrs. Felber!

]]> by: Mark N. http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1211 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1211 Honestly, Abe, which do you think you are more likely to find on a Fanatical Apathy board: an anti-Clinton-obsessed Republican, or a humorous liberal speaking with their tongue planted firmly in their cheek? Hello, Mrs. Felber! Honestly, Abe, which do you think you are more likely to find on a Fanatical Apathy board: an anti-Clinton-obsessed Republican, or a humorous liberal speaking with their tongue planted firmly in their cheek? Hello, Mrs. Felber!

]]> by: Bob http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1212 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1212 Abe called me a Republican - make him stop, Mrs. Felber! Abe called me a Republican - make him stop, Mrs. Felber!

]]> by: Anonymous Mommie http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1213 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2003/06/07/lets-pretend/#comment-1213 We'll have no more of this firm cheek planting, children, and that's that! We’ll have no more of this firm cheek planting, children, and that’s that!

]]>