OSLO (Reuters) - A Norwegian parliamentarian nominated President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair for the Nobel Peace Prize on Thursday, praising them for winning the war in Iraq .
‘Sometimes it’s necessary to use a small and effective war to prevent a much more dangerous war in the future,’ Jan Simonsen, a right-wing independent in Norway’s parliament, told Reuters.
Blessed are the warmakers.
Now, before you all start flying off the handle about this nomination, consider Mr. Simonsen’s argument: Had Bush and Blair not attacked Iraq there would have been a much bigger war between Iraq and… someone, and Iraq would’ve used all those weapons of mass destruction… that’ve gotta be around here somewhere, and untold thousands would’ve been killed by Saddam’s massive, deadly military… that more or less gave up without a fight, true, but still, y’know…
Look, Alfred Nobel would’ve understood. After all, his will clearly stated that the Peace Prize should go to individuals who “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” With the exception of our President’s military build-up, his renunciation of the United Nations’ efforts to find a diplomatic solution, and his withdrawal of “fraternity” between us and several of the world’s most powerful nations, Nobel’s description fits G.W. Bush to a tee.
Still not convinced? Think realpolitik rather than bleeding-heart old-school definitions of “peace” and “war” and “actual dead people.” The future of Iraq under Saddam Hussein was unknowable, of course, but it was probably really, really bad. By preventing that future from ever occurring, Bush and Blair have saved us from (forever) untold mayhem.
Scoff if you will, but it’s the same reasoning that I and (I suspect) many others employ when we suddenly find ourselves walking in a bad neighborhood at night: Rather than open myself to victimization, I promptly burn my wallet, grind my face against a wall or two, and toss myself down a few flights of stairs. Then - bruised, bloodied, limping and penniless - I proceed confidently through the “mean streets,” assured that I will no longer be a target for attacks that I can rest assured would have been much, much worse. It’s just good sense.
Of course, Bush and Blair didn’t lay down their own lives in Iraq, the limbs that were blown off were not theirs, but the principle is the same; if we want to enjoy the Omelet of Peace in the years to come, we might have to break a few eggs today. And heads. Eggs and heads.
Bon appetit. And congratulations to the fightin’ peacemakers of ‘03!





17 comments
Don
May 8, 2003 at 6:57 pm
1“the fightin’ peacemakers”
What a great name for a school’s team.
Makes me want to open a high school just to be able to use it.
Can you imagine the cheer that begins “Bles-sed be … “?
aaron
May 8, 2003 at 7:08 pm
2Well, that clinches it. With my vote (yes, I have a Nobel Prize vote.) I’m going to posthumously nominate Hitler.
Ellen
May 8, 2003 at 8:14 pm
3Well, Hitler did promote brotherhood amongst the nations that opposed him, didn’t he?
Linkmeister
May 8, 2003 at 8:37 pm
4The only choice more incongruous might be Sharon and Arafat (hey! Yasser would be the first double winner! A do-over!).
Don
May 9, 2003 at 12:51 am
5Arrid said:
” I’m going to posthumously nominate Hitler.”
I hadn’t heard about your death, Aaron. That could explain why you didn’t Excursize today.
I’m so sorry to hear about this. (Heh.)
Ibid
May 9, 2003 at 8:48 am
6I don’t see what the problem is. George Bush has done a wonderful job of uniting nations and promoting cooperation between people of different faiths. Who else could have turned the whole world against us so successfully?
Chicory
May 9, 2003 at 10:20 am
7Would y’all mind being just a bit less funny? My ribs hurt when I laugh.
Jeff
May 9, 2003 at 1:42 pm
81960’s expressions like “Fighting for peace is like f***ing for virginity” seem to apply once again. Revolution in the streets anyone?
Murray
May 9, 2003 at 2:16 pm
9This announcement officialy welcomes us to Bizzaro Land. Where the unelected adminstration fights a war to protect us from nonexistant weapons and armies and is awarded a Nobel Peace Prize nomination.
Strangely, I’m afraid that our stay here is not over.
Ras_Nesta
May 9, 2003 at 3:50 pm
10Wonder what aid doggie biscuit Karl Rove offered the Norweigans?
Eva
May 9, 2003 at 7:46 pm
11What, Bill Bennett is just too easy a target?…
Ken, Just Ken...
May 10, 2003 at 6:08 am
12Wow.
I honestly thought it was just America that was this messed up… I’ve been looking at the globe recently to find somewhere that Bush and his minions aren’t using their brain control rays.
Looks like I’m gonna have to put another big red X over Norway too.
aaron
May 10, 2003 at 7:10 am
13It just occurred to me…the peace prize that our “president” is being nominated for is NOT for his actions in the past year and a half, it’s for his actions from the first year and a half of his presidency! Remember? When, in a valliant effort to ensure world peace, he spent 85% of his time at the ranch in Texas?
“If ah don’t wirk, ah can’t make wores.”
I believe that was his quote.
Duncan
May 10, 2003 at 10:26 pm
14I’m sure the same guy pulled this stunt last year too. My guess is it’s Scandinavian humour. They put all the worthies in a bag with a ringer or two, shake it up and pick. How else do you explain Kissinger?
paul
May 11, 2003 at 12:00 am
15maybe the Nobel committee has one of those equal time rules, like the FCC. you know, if you give one to a Democratic president, you gotta give one to a Republican . . .
Anonymous
May 21, 2003 at 2:10 pm
16We’ve stepped through the looking glass, and all is nonsense now.
Steve
January 31, 2004 at 11:12 am
17Here is a letter that I am sending to Mr. Simonsen:
Dear Jan Simonsen,
I am writing to commend you on your recent nomination of George W. Bush and Tony Blair for the Nobel Peace Prize. You are indeed a brave man to stand strong against the mindless pacifism that has left most of Europe impotent to confront evil. I salute you.
A newspaper quoted you the other day as saying that the war in Iraq “made it possible to create democracy and respect for human rights in a country which for so many years has been ruled by one of the worst dictators in modern times.” I came as close to tears as a man can come when I read that. As you so eloquently put it: “Sometimes it’s necessary to use a small and effective war to prevent a much more dangerous war in the future.”
I’ve heard many folks argue that trying to bring peace to the world by waging war is like trying to love a person by hating them. Yet I believe – and I have a feeling you’re on the same page as me on this one – that war and peace, like love and hate, are really two sides of the same coin. I think the great American president Teddy Roosevelt expressed this philosophy best with his dictum: “Walk softly, but carry a big stick.” I try to live my live by those words. Let me give you a “for-instance” from my personal life that will help clarify the immediate purpose of this correspondence.
I love my wife dearly, and most of the time our relationship is as peaceful as a big green field full of lilies. Just last weekend, however, our blissful marriage hit a rocky patch. You see, after a long Saturday night of hard drinking I like nothing better than to come home and have my way (an American euphemism for relations) with my wife. I admit that she’s usually less than enthusiastic about having sex under these circumstances – at three in the morning with me stinking drunk – but for me, the conquest is half of the fun. Something got into her the other night, however, that made her ornerier than usual (probably that Hillary Clinton book she’s been reading – I hope for your sake that it hasn’t been translated into whatever you speak in Norway). Anyhow, when I climbed up on top of her, instead of reluctantly succumbing to my will as usual, she kneed me in the groin, jumped out of bed, and screamed that if I came near her again that she’d cut my manhood (American for male genitals) off with a pair of hedge-clippers.
Actually, that’s just the story I told the police. Honestly, I don’t really remember if she mentioned hedge clippers or not. In fact, I know she has no hedge-clippers in the house, let alone the bedroom. The point is that I’ve seen the witch brandish other instruments that could slice off my genitals, like steak knives and scissors. This is how I saw it: if I laughed the whole thing off and just went to bed, what’s to stop her from getting up at the crack of dawn, driving down the Kmart and buying a pair of hedge-clippers with which to sever my manhood as I lay in a drunken stupor? If I hesitated, proof that she had hedge-clippers may have come too late, in the form of my castration.
So I struck pre-emptively. As she cowered in the corner and sobbed that she wanted to make up, I picked up a baseball bat. I walked softly across the room and then swung hard, shattering her front teeth with my big stick. She slumped to the floor in shock and awe.
The nosy neighbors heard the commotion and called the police. A half hour later, as the cops were walking me, dazed and handcuffed, out of my own house, I wondered at my predicament. After all, I had only stepped in to prevent my wife from doing something both of us would have regretted. As the cops attempted to restrain me, I yelled: “You’re arresting me for assault?! I should be nominated for the husband of the year award!”
They didn’t understand, but I knew you would.
So, I’m in a bit of a pickle (that’s an Americanism for legal trouble). Any chance you could offer me political asylum in Norway?
Chester Swantzkopf