There’s no sense arguing about it any more. We Americans - conservative or liberal, atheist or religious, black or white - live inside our own movies. Everything in our lives, from the teen sex romps of our youths to the romantic comedies of our courtships to the searing dramas of our eventual terminal illnesses, is shaped by our unshakeable conviction that we are the stars of our own Hollywood features.
So when it comes to shared experiences, events bigger than our own lives, the only real question up for debate is, “What kind of movie is this, anyway?” [To argue that this is, in fact, reality and not actually a movie - that movies are supposed to reflect reality and not vice versa - is to fundamentally misunderstand the American experience. Go back to France.]
To our Administration, the War in Iraq was quite obviously a war movie or a western, and we’ve just come to the end of it. The marines or cavalry have come storming in, the final duel’s been fought in the town square, and the good guys have won the day. Old Glory is flying proudly, the sexy heroine embraces our hero, the wounded-but-miraculously-alive Lt. Riggs gives a thumbs-up from his stretcher, and ol’ Pops jumps up and down and hugs his burro in a silly but touching bit of comic relief. Roll the credits and be sure to come back next week for our new feature, “The Road to Damascus.”
Unfortunately, we anti-war-in-Iraq folks see it differently. We’re no less guilty of Hollywoodization, of course. But we’re living a different sort of movie, and one that may be sadly closer to reality.
It’s a monster movie. And we’re only at the end of the second act.
The heart and soul of a creature feature is the idea that the authorities just don’t get it. They don’t really understand the nature of the threat we’re facing, and their knee-jerk use of force is only going to make things worse. We’re the white-jacketed, studious, but undeniably handsome scientists who find themselves pushed to the sidelines halfway through, as the military or police force pump round after round into the horrifying creature from outer space/ underground/ beneath the ocean/ the heart of the reactor. In vain we stand there and scream, “No! Don’t! You don’t understand! Electricity makes him stronger! Bullets only make him angry! It feeds on that stuff! No, you fools, it’s an egg sac!!”
Oddly, though, the creature does fall. And the sergeant blows on his smoking pistol, pats us patronizingly on the back, the townsfolk cheer, and the tanks roll off to their next mission. Even the heaving-bosomed young lab assistant thinks we’re just jealous of the real men who saved the city.
But we’re only at the end of Act 2. You know what’s coming. It’s practically coded into your American DNA.
Slowly, largely unseen by the celebrating masses, the creature slowly pulls itself to its feet. Reconstitutes itself. Its shattered pieces begin to pulse and grow, each one a rapidly-expanding perfect replica of the original… Suddenly, a small boy points and screams…

[”Dear god, it’s back! And stronger than ever!”]
This is what us white-coated heroes were trying to tell everybody back during the last reel. The real nature of the enemy, the true threat, has been misidentified. And now we’re really in for it.
Fundamentalism may now take hold in Iraq, and Sharia law will reign. Hezbollah, long largely concerned with Israel, is now howling for American blood via suicide bombings. The ignored idea that Saddam’s regime was as hateful to Islamists as it was to us is now proving to be at least partly true.
These developments do not constitute a victory. At best it’s a sad vindication of the world-view of the Creaturists over that of the Westernists. And there’s some essential and sobering traits of the creature feature that we have to keep in mind: Now it’s up to us to come up with some kind of brilliant, last-ditch solution. The sheriffs and generals may never acknowledge that much of this was caused by their own reckless militaristic overkill, and the work of the real heroes often goes unnoticed by the larger population. Most alarmingly, though, there’s the simple fact that in these types of movies, us heroic nerds don’t always succeed. Sometimes the creature wins. A desperate citizen runs towards the camera and screams “Run for your lives!” Even if we do triumph, in our cinematic world there’s always a late-appearing question mark after “The End” is splashed upon the screen.
But that doesn’t mean it’s not worth a try. I don’t know what the right solution is going to be, but as a loyal Cinematic American I know this about the Plan: We’ve got nothing to lose! It’s so crazy it just might work! And it’s our only hope!
Start thinking, Creaturists. We may never win the love of a grateful public, we won’t ride a tank triumphantly down Main Street, and saving the world will have to be our sole reward. That and the buxom lab assistant. And that’s not so bad.





20 comments
John Isbell
April 18, 2003 at 2:20 pm
1Brilliant.
I’ll try stopping cars as the trucks roll by laden with pods.
Jay Greenspan
April 18, 2003 at 2:30 pm
2Nice piece, Adam. But I think you’ve mis-outlined this flick. We’re not at the end of Act II — we’re on page 10. The hero of the moment foolishly celebrates as the antagonistic force is just becoming known. In my mind’s movie we pan from the hero atop a tank, basking in the cheers of an adoring crowd, to a swarthy, shadowy figure lurking in a darkened corner. At once we notice the hollowness of the victory. While this man’s motives and intentions are unknown in this shot, the scowl and the change in music make one thing clear: we will see this man again, and when we do he will set in motion a plot full of danger and violence.
t.a.
April 18, 2003 at 3:28 pm
3the first such creature feature was “war of the worlds” by h.g. wells, who more or less invented science fiction. human power proved vain against the invaders; it was the earth itself (seen by wells, i think, as god’s providence) that stopped the threat. the martians simply could not survive in our environment.
i haven’t figured out how that relates to this wonderful piece. in my heart, i want to believe that hate cannot exist on this planet, that it will have to die for humanity to continue. sadly, if we refuse to relinquish our hold on hate, the conclusion is obvious.
Landis
April 18, 2003 at 5:26 pm
4Is it wrong to hope beyond hope that I was wrong, that you were wrong, that this IS a Western and we’re now headed off into that sunset? I hope they find those WMDs (and that it’s clear they weren’t brought in on a C130). I hope that democracy is established and the new Iraq becomes a great friend of the US and a model for the shaping of the new Middle East. I hope that I was wrong.
God I hope this is a Western.
Mike Z
April 18, 2003 at 9:44 pm
5Ok, so let’s push the metaphor a little further: Whether Western or Creature feature, the enemy is typically dehumanized, which is one of the main gripes of the Muslim world–they perceive a lack of respect. So perhaps the plot line needed here is more like a romantic comedy. Only when one side finally shows respect for the other as an equal do they really come to work things out in a more stable way and live happily ever after. Before that happens there’s supposed to be a bunch of humorous misunderstandings and maybe a boob shot or two. Unfortunately, our real situation has substituted action-movie explosion sequences for the funny/sexy parts, thus bewildering the American audience. The guy at the video store with the Texas accent said this was a Western, but I think it got mis-shelved.
Scott
April 18, 2003 at 11:33 pm
6Is that English reporter lady in Baghdad the “buxom lab-assistant”? or is she, you know, the “reporter”.
If Victoria Clarke is the “lab-assistant”, let the monster eat everything. Usually I am more concerned with the messege than the medium; but during the dirst few days of was I was floored when she read the names of the first 7 American killed in the copter crash while she was wearing some weird suit that was _half_ hot-pink. They are DEAD. DEAD does not go with hot-pink.
Pat K.
April 19, 2003 at 6:45 pm
7I thought Jules Verne “more or less invented science fiction” …
Pat K.
Frank P.
April 19, 2003 at 11:21 pm
8Are you out of your mind? Isn’t he FRENCH?
Georgette
April 20, 2003 at 11:34 am
9Oh, don’t worry.
I’ve seen this before.
You simply throw a pail of water over them, click your heels three times, and it’s all over, and we can go home again. Right?
MeanTim
April 20, 2003 at 3:35 pm
10I’m with Landis… please please PLEEEEEEAAAASE be a Western….
Jon
April 20, 2003 at 7:27 pm
11I think we’re gonna need a bigger boat.
Bob
April 20, 2003 at 8:01 pm
12I’m guessing this administration thinks more in terms of TV shows than movies. Wait’ll they find out that we’re in for more than a three-hour tour.
Ellen
April 21, 2003 at 1:58 am
13Actually, I took a class on Science Fiction last year that was fairly adamant that Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein was *the* first example of science fiction.
A scientist, ostracized by his peers because of what he’s doing, creates something terrible and guess what? It isn’t that happy with it’s creator and kills the pretty girl and vows to make the doctor’s life a living hell. Hmmm….
(Man, I hope I’m remembering that correctly)
Marlon Brando
April 21, 2003 at 8:44 am
14… the horror, the horror …
David
April 21, 2003 at 2:30 pm
15I agree with Bob. Unfortunately the show is Howdy-Doody (which come to think of it was around the last time our nation toyed with the dreaded F word).
Anonymous
April 21, 2003 at 10:45 pm
16I really like what you’ve done here Adam.
it’s times like this that i have to stop, and look at my WWAD bracelet. what would arnold do?
is the best way to defeat terrorists simply by pushing them into a vat of molten steel? or do you have to battle them in the jungle, and after they’ve killed all your commando buddies, settle once and for all with blowing themselves up?
since he is considering running for office, i think he’s the best chance we have at finishing them off once and for all
pete
April 21, 2003 at 10:46 pm
17… or maybe he’ll have to infiltrate a prepubescent nursery of some sort
Brooke
April 22, 2003 at 2:41 am
18I love you’re piece but alas the film is still a paranoid double espionage action adventure because within the plan is the inevitable growth of the monster…that IS the plan.. that way the (oh so glorious and lucrative) fight can continue and then even the kindly and wise scientists will have to be pulled in because then it will really BE a defensive war by then.
..But maybe.. if the creature takes notice of the nerd scientists and somehow they can communicate and put their many heads together…well ya got something there..
Chicory
April 22, 2003 at 10:08 am
19Regretfully, I think this is more a book than a movie. Anyone read “Jurassic Park”? The book *does not* end the way the movie did. Those of us who know that the natural course has been put into motion, despite the “war” to stop them, can only hope that the *migration* of the raptors (fundamentalists) isn’t as far reaching as we fear.
(I see myself as the buxom scientist. No supporting/second billing role. )
Julia
April 25, 2003 at 12:02 pm
20Until we actually started “Shock & Awe”, I was hoping this was only “War Games” and Powell or someone would step up and ask “Shall we play a game?” Alas, this was not to be.
Even earlier on, and now I guess, I wonder if maybe this is “A Boy and His Dog” (early Don Johnson) and we’ll find out who is the smart one. In the movie, the dog is the brains of the pair.
If this is truly a comedy, maybe it’s “Bringing Up Baby”, where we’re chasing a dog and a leopard while trying to retrieve a bone (an intercostal clavical, I believe) as we fall in love. In the end, we find the bone, the dog, the leopard and destroy the dinosaur. Hmmmm.
Maybe this is “Mommy Dearest”, the neverending quest for a mother’s approval. Put Bush Sr. &/or Saddam in Joan’s pointy shoes and Bush Jr. &/or Saddam’s sons, cabinet, Ossama, any garden variety terrorist in Christina’s never-quite-right shoes. NO MORE WIRE HANGERS! really means ACCEPT NO EQUALS, LEVEL THE COMPETITION!, at all costs, of course, since it’s not their lives or money they spend.
But then again, the horrifying, more likely conclusion is that we’re all stuck in “Dr. Strangelove” and you-know-who is Kong, riding the bomb to it’s destination, yiping and swinging his cowboy hat all the way down while the perverse one sits in a bunker, divvying out survival spots. Oh, that could be either fool in either role, couldn’t it? I guess Peter Sellars should’a had one more part, hmmm?