“At a time when American culture and values are under attack all over the world, we think it is more important than ever that we honor those achievements that reflect us and Americans at our best,” Academy president Frank Pierson told reporters in front of the Kodak, the site of Sunday’s Oscars.”
- from E! online.
A think tank would be hard pressed to come up with any world event of any degree of seriousness that did not make the Hollywood establishment conclude that it was now more important than ever to get together and hand each other statuettes. We can pray for a slightly less self-aggrandizing ceremony than last year (see March 25), but if I were a bettin’ man I’d be putting my money on a horse named Sanctimony. At least this year we’ll see our glittering overclass divided in their opinions about the war, which might make for some real entertainment.
Still, I have to confess to a bit of hypocrisy here: I am after all, marginally involved in movies and the whole wonderful Business of Show. And I love the Academy Awards.
Rather than give you a full-fledged preview, I’ll just handicap some of the bigger awards (click here for the complete list of nominees):
Best Actress - Much has been said about Nicole Kidman’s nasal enhancements in “The Hours.” If she wins, what kind of message are we sending to little girls around the world? They’ll look at their tiny, inadequate little button noses in the mirror and feel like they somehow fall short of this unrealistic and unattainable standard of beauty. Women, real women, don’t have schnozzes like that. Ms. Kidman should be ashamed.
Best Actor - All the other nominees know that a year when Jack Nicholson is nominated and might actually deserve it is not a year when one has to spend too much time preparing an acceptance speech. And of course Jack himself never devotes too much time to preparing an acceptance speech. So whoever wins, you can count on the most ill-prepared acceptance speech of the evening.
Best Supporting Actress - It might be said (by somebody far cruder than myself), that given the presence of Kathy Bates and Queen Latifah, this year’s supporting actresses needed more, um, support than any previous crop of nominees. But honestly, these two full-figured stars and their compatriots are by far the most impressive and competitive nominees this year, and yours truly has absolutely no idea who’ll win. The real winner, I suppose, will be the International Underwirers Union.
Best Supporting Actor - Another very strong and unpredictable category this year. And any one of the nominees seems capable of taking the stage and making a current events oriented statement that’ll grab headlines tomorrow morning. This may well be the acceptance speech to watch (with the exception of the inevitable heretofore unknown longhaired effects man or documentary maker who’ll say something bold and cede his right to Ever Have Lunch in This Town Again).
Best Director - Everyone’s expecting Martin Scorcese to win this one for his incredible directorial work in “Raging Bull,” “Goodfellas,” and “After Hours.” And “Taxi Driver.” And “The King of Comedy.” Have I left anything out?
Best Picture - “Chicago” is the hands-down favorite, as it is in most of the categories. Despite the lack of better-than-average singing or dancing skills exhibited by most of its stars, it’s not unworthy. And it has probably convinced a host of other Hollywood stars that they too might be capable of singing and dancing and taking parts that they’re not exactly suited for, which is sure to generate loads of cinematic entertainment for years to come. I for one can’t wait to see Michael Douglas in the title role of “Pippen.”
A note for “The Lord of the Rings” fans. Hollywood doesn’t know how to deal with a trilogy, nor have they read the books (if they had, they’d have realized that Ian McKellan needed to win the Oscar last year). So expect the only artistically valid blockbuster series in movie history to once again find itself with only an effects trophy or two. “The Fellowship” was bypassed because there were more to come; this year, hobbits are old news. Next year’s hard to predict, except for this: With the ongoing wars in Iran and North Korea, it will be more important than ever to go on with the Academy Awards and celebrate what’s best about America. The road goes ever on….





11 comments
Catherine D.
March 23, 2003 at 1:51 pm
1Um, remember the movie version of “A Chorus Line”? Michael Douglas has already been there, done that - badly.
trey
March 23, 2003 at 3:42 pm
2I’m a new reader of your blog, and have enjoyed it so far. One small typo in your post - “Pippin” is the correct spelling of the play Michael Douglas would no doubt decrease the enjoyment of.
aaron
March 23, 2003 at 4:48 pm
3I am not a praying man, (or a praying mantis) but if I were, I would be praying that this year, they decide to televise the handing-out of the award for “best documentary” just to see what Michael Moore has to say.
(unless, of course, Jaques Perrin’s “Winged Migration” pulls off the upset)
sc
March 23, 2003 at 8:39 pm
4Thanks for the note to Lord of the Rings fans.
Sara J
March 23, 2003 at 9:17 pm
5Expect LTR to take home lots of trophies next year due to its subject matter: the epic battle between West and (Middle) East, with reinforcements barely trickling into the fight on the side of the West, while a mighty army is grown out of the very rocks on the side of the East. Who could resist the spectacle of the West pulling out a victory against such overwhelming odds, casting down Saddam Hussein–I mean, Sauron–and tossing his weapon(s) of mass destruction into the Fire?
Of course, the West would never use such weapons… at least, had not when Tolkein was writing. Maybe Peter Jackson has “updated” that part of the plot, too.
Raya
March 23, 2003 at 9:39 pm
6As a New Zealander, I of course feel that all the Lord of Rings movies should win in every category, including both Best Documentary and Best Actress, which it has been unfairly excluded from on the sheer technicality that there aren’t any women in it to speak of….
Jon
March 24, 2003 at 12:06 am
7Word to Raya. A three-hour epic movie that’s most intriguing character is part CGI and includes an hour-long battle scene featuring orcs, elves, men, and uruk-hai- that’s movie making. Chicago my ass.
kate
March 24, 2003 at 10:22 am
8Adam F. and guest commentator Aaron are psychic or something. Good call on Michael Moore.
Chicory
March 24, 2003 at 10:28 am
9Thank heavens for Michael. Glad he didn’t “check” his “papers” at the door. He said he would let them have it and he did. I don’t know why people booed. They knew what was coming.
I still have visions of Bush, with fingers in ears, going “La, la, la, la, la, la….” while Michael talked. And I KNOW Michael wouldn’t have cared. At least *someone* had the huevos to be honest.
Thompsons
May 20, 2003 at 2:51 pm
10We had fingers and toes crossed that Winged Migration would win the Award. We felt some small part of the movie as the crew and all of the geese plus 2 ultra lites spent 2 months here..at The Norridgewock,29C HC60 Beaver River, Eagle Bay, NY 13331…We have been trying to purchase a poster and trying to learn where to see the movie.Would dearly like to be able to show it here for all the Adirondack people the crew and the geese met during their stay..realizing that likely won’t happen we would like to send Congratulations to Mr. Perrin and Mr. Cluzaud plus all of the people who worked so hard here everyday of their stay. I cannot find an email address for Galatee Films nor either of the directors
Anonymous
December 2, 2003 at 8:06 pm
11UH Smart one. About Nicole Kidman she did that for the film to look more like that of Virginia Woolf. She was trying to embody the character in which she was portraying. If she would have kept the nose she has in her normal life, she would have not been embodying her character fully. Maybe you should think before you speak, and you would appear more intelligent.