When we lost the Turkish Parliament vote, we demanded a do-over. When France signaled their intractability, we yelled, “Aw, nuts to you! We were only pretending to like you anyway!” And now that it looks like we won’t be getting those extra Security Council votes, well, we’re just gonna take our ball and go home. We’re not playing anymore. Stupid votes. Stupid, stupid UN. We hate you. You’re not the boss of us. We can go to war anytime we want to…
This new wave of diaper diplomacy has appalled even the senior Bushes, prompting our President’s father to issue an amazingly under-reported verbal spanking to his ill-behaved boy (at my alma mater, no less!).
George Sr., you’re not alone. This is understandable - we all know what it’s like when our kids go through a difficult phase and embarrass us in public. Of course, most of us don’t give our poorly-behaving kids complete control of the most powerful and deadly military force in the history of the world. Even Dr. Spock thought that was a no-no, advising, “Poor behavior should never be rewarded by putting the child in charge of a massive arsenal and thousands of highly-trained military personnel who will obey the child’s every whim.” How right he was. So George, you’re kind of on your own on that one.
As for the rest of us, let’s be patient. Papa George may yet sway his tantrum-prone progeny. We might get it right. There’s still time, not much, but let’s remember we’re not actually at war yet.
And we haven’t threatened to use nuclear weapons yet either, so that’s a positive thing. But if Saddam Hussein “double-dog dares” us to, head for the shelters.





21 comments
Katie
March 14, 2003 at 3:17 am
1OK. We tried the UN. We tried global peer pressure. Now it is time to do what we should have done a long time ago.
Let’s release the Moms to convince Shrub of the error of his ways; or, failing that, to at least send him to his room for a good long time to think about it. (Like until Nov. 2004 would be good…..)
Ken
March 14, 2003 at 5:48 am
2Oooh a spanking!
Trousers off, Pants down, let the spanking begin!!!!
And let’s televise it.
aaron
March 14, 2003 at 8:07 am
3A surprisingly reasonable statement from someone who I previously had absolutely no respect for. (Not you, Adam…Bush Sr.)
Thad
March 14, 2003 at 10:05 am
4I rather like this bit, from whitehouse.org:
PRESIDENT RESPONDS TO TREASONOUS CRITICISM FROM DECREPIT ONE-TERM HAS-BEEN WHO’D BETTER KEEP HIS GERIATRIC CAKEHOLE SHUT IF HE KNOWS WHAT’S GOOD FOR FATHER’S DAY
max
March 14, 2003 at 10:56 am
5Um, I think that nukes are actually on the table if Saddy use his weppuns o’ terra on our boys in uniform. And the MOAB, although not technically a nuke, is sure as sand a WMD. Perhaps it’s a psycholgical weapon mostly, but it’s still the biggest-ass bomb ever built.
There is also a very interesting article about the hopefylly-but-probably-not-coincidental-due-to-the-flaming-religious-w acko-wingnut-little-problem-we-have naming of the bomb “MOAB”. I don’t remember where I saw it (sorry) but the point is that the name has serious Biblical interpretations and comes from the pResident’s “end times” dogma of his evangelical beliefs.
Ibid
March 14, 2003 at 11:56 am
6Adam, you have made my day. Seriously. The sun’s a little brighter and the birds are a little louder (Shut those things up would ya? I’m writing to Adam!).
Raya
March 14, 2003 at 12:02 pm
7Let’s take stock, shall we?
THE LIFE OF AN AMERICAN LIBERAL IN 2003
Effective immediately, all self-evident truths of one decade ago shall be reversed, including but not limited to the following:
1) Those formerly known in colloquial discussion as “evil fascists” shall henceforth be referred to as “voices of reason.” EXAMPLES: George H. W. Bush, Colin Powell.
2) Positions formerly known as “right-wing ideology” shall henceforth be known as “Democratic values.” EXAMPLE: Anti-choice legislation.
3) Democratic Presidential candidates shall no longer be required to show up for Senate votes that might force them to choose between alienating their Democratic base and alienating their Republican johns.
Yay America!
Ann
March 14, 2003 at 12:52 pm
8What is the Times Online? Is it associated with a physical newspaper, or does it live only on the Web?
Adam–love your stuff, but you need an editor. “Highly” and “poorly” don’t take hyphens.
b
March 14, 2003 at 2:14 pm
9ann– it’s a blog– it’s not the webster dictionary– occasional lapses in correct–grammer–punctuation–uh–speling-are-allowed.
;)
Carol
March 14, 2003 at 3:43 pm
10Ann
1. What is the Times Online?! It’s the Times of London, of course, only one of the oldest and most respected newspapers in the world!
2. When adverbs like ‘highly’ and ‘poorly’ are used together with adjectives (or participles acting like adjectives) to modify a noun, then hyphens are called for.
Example:
The soldiers are highly trained. (no hyphen because ‘highly trained’ doesn’t precede ’soldiers’)
They are highly-trained soldiers. (hyphen needed to connect the adverb-adjective combo modifying ’soldiers’)
Got that, everyone?
Carol
March 14, 2003 at 3:50 pm
11Adam,
In my grammar-inspired frenzy I forgot to say how great I think this site is. I really appreciate the links to information and sites that I otherwise would miss. You truly have a way with words, and today’s entry was (as usual) inspired.
Chicory
March 14, 2003 at 4:01 pm
12Internation diplomacy is a very difficult and subtle process. Like any child who is being asked to do something he isn’t ready for, shrub is throwing a temper tantrum. Asking him to get an ok from the Security Council to fight Iraq was to great a task for shrub. He needs to start with something that is more reasonable and likely to lead to success.
Therefore, I suggest Collen Powell sidetrack shrub by getting him to go the the UN and get the Security Council to declare war on France. Bet the Germans will back that one
Melinda
March 14, 2003 at 8:53 pm
13Carol, I think you’re wrong. You don’t hyphenate an adverb-participle combination if the adverb ends in “ly.” At least that’s what the Chicago Manual of Style and Gregg’s say. I don’t know about other style guides.
But that’s beside the point. Yes, this is a terrific site!
Miel
March 15, 2003 at 12:57 am
14I wouldn’t call it a ’spanking.’ Isn’t it more a bit of father-son advice? And then I think the result will not be a sudden increase in good behavior but ultra-rebellion: Son will declare war on France, war on Germany….Then the scene at the end of the movie…Dad says, “Son, I know that I didn’t say it much but I always loved you. I love you Georgie…Even though you’ve left the country in shambles, killed thousands and the Middle East is now a burning cinder.” Son will tear up, realize the error of his ways and never wage war again. In other words: We need to get George, Sr. to give George, Jr. a big hug and say how much he loves him. The problem will be that this won’t work for the rest of the people who are actually running the country. Does anyone know where Cheney and Rumsfeld’s dads are? Wolfowitz? What about Rice? (Maybe it has to be a mom then, I’m not sure how it works when it’s a woman.) Please! Tell your children you love them before it’s too late!
ishmael
March 15, 2003 at 1:27 am
15It might be too adult for describing the behavior of Butch, but I’m reminded of the line from The Treasure of the Sierra Madres: “Badges! We don’t need no steenkin badges!”
Bob Ully
March 15, 2003 at 2:36 pm
16Adam, now you’re scarin’ me. Say something funny, quick I don’t have a fallout shelter. Oh nevermind, it wouldn’t worth coming out of the shelter anyway.
Anonymous
March 15, 2003 at 10:52 pm
17Yeah… you all pretty much have lost touch with reality…
Linkmeister
March 16, 2003 at 1:31 am
18If that last remark was meant seriously, whoever it was appears to be incapable of discerning black (bleak?) humor. Hmm; sounds like the definition of a Re…nah, I’ll play nicely.
Anonymous
March 16, 2003 at 1:38 pm
19A cynical soul I know suggested that Pere et Fils are engaged in a game of Good Cop, Bad Cop.
Meg
Anonymous
May 12, 2003 at 1:55 pm
20you suck
emily
September 15, 2003 at 10:38 am
21Whats wrong with bush he is awesome